प्रार्थना की भाषा

एक प्रार्थना का पाठ केवल एक ही सार्वजनिक प्रार्थना के कार्य में महत्वपूर्ण तत्व है ।
जिस तरह से एक प्रार्थना की जाती है, उसके साथ आने वाले दृष्टिकोण, और गैर-आदिवासी इशारे जो इसे पूरक करते हैं, अक्सर प्रार्थना के अर्थ के रूप में पाठ के रूप में ही संवाद करते हैं।
यह लेख सार्वजनिक प्रार्थना के पूरे कार्य को देखता है, प्रार्थना के बारे में पूजा योजनाकारों देहाती, पूजन और सौंदर्य दिशानिर्देशों की पेशकश करता है।
यह स्वास्थ्य का संकेत है और खुशी के लिए एक कारण है कि किताबों की दुकानों की अलमारियों पूजा और प्रार्थना के बारे में पुस्तकों में प्रार्थना के लिए इतने सारे संसाधन ले ।
लेकिन मेरे पढ़ने में, पूजा में प्रार्थना का एक महत्वपूर्ण हिस्सा अल्प ध्यान खींचता है: अर्थात्, प्रार्थना करने के तरीके और पूजा में अनुभव किए जाते हैं।
पूजा में प्रार्थना करने का यह कार्य इस लेख का ध्यान केंद्रित है।
हम सभी को एक मंडली में बैठने और जिस तरह से नेता उन्हें बोलता है द्वारा खराब प्रार्थना करने का अनुभव था: धन्यवाद की प्रार्थना एक अशिष्ट, उदास फैशन में आवाज उठाई; एक मतलब या अभिमानी बढ़त के साथ हिमायत की प्रार्थना, जैसे कि मण्डली प्रार्थना में कारणों के लिए अपर्याप्त चिंता के लिए डांटा जा रहा था ।
कई साल पहले, मैं एक चर्च अध्ययन समूह से संक्षेप में बात करने के लिए कहा गया था ।
असाइनमेंट के लिए सबसे अच्छी तरह से प्यार फैशन मैं प्रबंधन कर सकता में प्यार के बारे में बात की थी ।
मुझे याद है, संयोग से, कि मैं इसे एक परेशान आसान काम पाया और कामना की वहां इस तरह के भाषणों के लिए और अधिक मांग थी ।
यह अनुभव मन में कहा जाता है जब कुछ प्रार्थना पूजा में बात कर रहे हैं: बोलने का मूड शब्दों की सामग्री का उल्लंघन करती है ।
यह थोड़ा आश्चर्य की बात है, तो, कि प्रार्थना के व्यक्तियों साहित्य में अपेक्षाकृत कम ध्यान प्राप्त करता है ।
शायद यह असावधानी इसलिए है क्योंकि प्रार्थना के बारे में अक्सर लिखने वाले कई लोगों के पास शब्दों की शक्ति का लगभग जादुई दृश्य होता है।
वहां है, मुझे संदेह है, एक unvoiced धारणा है कि प्रार्थना के लिए शब्द अगर खूबसूरती से पर्याप्त लिखा है, जरूरी प्रार्थना सिर्फ इसलिए कि वे इतनी जबरदस्ती लिखा जाता है ।
सही शब्दों की शक्ति में इस तरह के विश्वास भी पूजा का नेतृत्व किया जा रहा है और प्रार्थना की जा रही के बारे में एक प्रकार की आत्ममुग्धता के लिए नेतृत्व कर सकते हैं ।
ऐसा लगता है कि कभी-कभार ऐसा लगता है कि जब तक हमें सही प्रार्थनाएं करनी हैं, तब तक कोई आलोचना हमें छू नहीं सकती ।
कुछ साल पहले, मैंने “उच्च चर्च” मंडलियों के साथ काले चर्चों की पूजा की तुलना सुनी।
एक काले चर्च में उपासकों, यह देखा गया था, पता था कि अगर मसीह को वापस लौटने और उनकी पूजा की यात्रा कर रहे थे, प्रशंसा पर उनके सभी कमजोर मानव प्रयास भगवान की पवित्रता की उपस्थिति से दूर जला दिया जाएगा ।
उच्च चर्च प्रोटेस्टेंट वाद में, हालांकि, यदि प्रभु को पूजा करने के लिए वापस जाना था, तो पूजा के नेता प्रभु (क) शैली के वैभव और सामग्री की गंभीरता से प्रभावित होने की उम्मीद करेंगे, और (ख) चुपचाप पीठ में एक सीट लेने के लिए और पूजा के प्रवाह को परेशान नहीं करेंगे।
यह तुलना एक निश्चित जुझारू अधिकार को इंगित करने के लिए काम कर सकती है, हमारी कुछ प्रार्थनाओं में एक झूठा गर्व है जो पूजा को बहुत मुश्किल बना सकता है।
चिंता है कि पूजा में प्रार्थना जिस तरह से वे आवाज उठाई है द्वारा बर्बाद नहीं किया जा कुछ हद तक प्रोफेसर राल्फ अंडरवुड द्वारा व्यक्त की चिंता के समान है (“देहाती देखभाल मंत्रालय में भगवान की उपस्थिति,” {1>ऑस्टिन प्रेस्बिटेरियन सेमिनरी बुलेटिन<1} 101:4 [अक्टूबर १९८५]) ।
अपने लेख की धारा के तहत “देहाती प्रार्थना के लिए दिशानिर्देश,” डॉ ।
अंडरवुड “प्रामाणिक प्रतिक्रिया के रूप में प्रार्थना के लिए कॉल… [के रूप में] एक यात्रा के अंत में पारंपरिक प्रार्थना का विरोध किया, पादरी अनुष्ठान बच… । “वह तो तीन दिशा निर्देश है कि देहाती सेटिंग्स में प्रार्थना में इस प्रामाणिकता को प्रोत्साहित करेगा प्रदान करता है ।
ये दिशानिर्देश तीन प्रश्नों के रूप में हैं:
1.
“प्रार्थना हम लोगों के साथ भगवान के लिए एक प्रतिक्रिया है?”
2.
“प्रार्थना व्यक्ति या व्यक्तियों की उपस्थिति में हम अपने आप को खोजने के लिए एक प्रतिक्रिया है?”
3.
“क्या प्रार्थना इंजील के परमेश्वर के लिए एक प्रतिक्रिया है?”
यह स्पष्ट है कि पूजा में प्रार्थना देहाती देखभाल में प्रार्थना से अलग है।
उपासना में प्रार्थना देहाती मंत्रालय के क्षणों में प्रार्थना के रूप में व्यक्तिगत या असंरक्षित नहीं होना चाहिए।
पूजा में प्रार्थना कहीं अधिक लोगों को नेता के साथ प्रार्थना कर रहा है और इन लोगों पर कुछ शैक्षिक प्रभाव पड़ता है; जो लोग पूजा में प्रार्थना का नेतृत्व करते हैं, उन्हें उनका हिसाब लेने का प्रयास करना चाहिए।
प्रार्थना के प्रकार में इन स्पष्ट मतभेदों के बावजूद, वहां अभी भी एक महान सौदा करने के लिए डॉ का उपयोग करके सीखा जा रहा है ।
अंडरवुड के दिशा निर्देशों की पूजा में हमारी प्रार्थना का आकलन करने के लिए, विशेष रूप से उन लोगों के लिए नेता द्वारा बोली जाने वाली प्रार्थनाएं ।
लोगों के लिए प्रतिक्रिया
यह डॉ के साथ शुरू करने के लिए उपयोगी हो जाएगा ।
अंडरवुड का दूसरा सवाल:
“प्रार्थना व्यक्तियों जिनकी उपस्थिति में हम अपने आप को खोजने के लिए एक प्रतिक्रिया है?”
पूजा में प्रार्थना, देहाती देखभाल में प्रार्थना की तरह, और अधिक लगभग जीवित और प्रामाणिक होगा अगर लोगों को वक्ता के साथ प्रार्थना करने के लिए आमंत्रित अपने अनुभव के कुछ पहचान प्रार्थना में परिलक्षित ।
जब प्रार्थनाओं में इस बात के लिए धन्यवाद दिया जाता है कि कलीसिया क्या आभारी महसूस करती है और जब वे मण्डली के लिए प्रार्थना करते हैं, तो उन प्रार्थनाओं से लोगों की पूजा को समृद्ध और सक्रिय करने की संभावना अधिक होती है ।
लोगों के अनुभव के इस प्रतिबिंब के लिए लोगों के साथ देहाती सामग्री और उस अनुभव पर कुछ ध्यान केंद्रित करने की आवश्यकता होगी।
डॉक्‍टर।
जेंस ए जोंस, एक कक्षा अपनी प्रार्थना की मात्रा के लिए एक परिचय के रूप में मुद्रित व्याख्यान में, एफ .B के उदाहरण का पालन करने के बारे में बताया ।
मेयेर{1>(लोगों<1} के लिए प्रार्थना [रिचमंड:
जॉन नॉक्स, 1967], 11) ।
श्री मेयेर चर्च में जाना होगा और सप्ताह के दौरान गलियारे चलना ।
वह जानता था कि लोग कहां बैठे हैं, उनके pews में बैठते है और उनके लिए वहां प्रार्थना करेंगे ।
इस तरह का अनुशासन पूजा में प्रार्थनाओं को लोगों के लिए प्रामाणिक प्रतिक्रिया बना सकता है ।
पूजा में प्रार्थना और अधिक लगभग जीवित और प्रामाणिक होगा अगर लोगों को उंहें न केवल अपने अनुभवों को दर्शाती है, लेकिन यह भी अपनी प्रार्थना को दर्शाती है ।
जब तक हम एक मण्डली के प्रार्थना जीवन को पूरी तरह से कभी नहीं जान सकते हैं, तो हम सुरक्षित रूप से मान सकते हैं कि लोग जानते हैं कि उनकी प्रार्थनाएं अपूर्ण और अपर्याप्त हैं।
एक अजीब सवाल तो सामना करने की जरूरत है: पूजा में प्रार्थना है कि हमेशा ध्यान से तैयार की जाती है और सुरुचिपूर्ण लोगों की प्रामाणिक प्रार्थना हो सकता है?
सवाल घूमा जा सकता है: जब पूजा में हमारी प्रार्थना हमेशा अच्छी तरह से बदल जाती है और नियंत्रित होती है, तो क्या हम लोगों को यह नहीं सिखाते कि केवल सही प्रार्थनाएं स्वीकार्य हैं?
क्या लोग यह निष्कर्ष नहीं निकालते हैं कि प्रार्थनाएं सुरुचिपूर्ण से कम होंगी (डॉ का उपयोग करने के लिए।
अंडरवुड वाक्यांश) “दमन की आवश्यकता है”?
अच्छी तरह से तैयार प्रार्थना की प्रभावशीलता के बारे में एक सवाल उठा, ज़ाहिर है, पूजा प्रार्थना में सबसे खराब तरह की सुस्ती का औचित्य साबित करने के लिए दुरुपयोग किया जा सकता है ।
लेकिन इस खतरे को समझते हुए, प्रार्थना की ज़रूरत नहीं बदलती है, जो कम से कम एक हद तक, मंडली के लोगों के प्रार्थना जीवन को प्रतिबिंबित करती है।
 
अंडरवुड का तर्क है कि देहाती देखभाल सेटिंग्स में प्रार्थना भी हमारी झूठी चेतना या हमारे भ्रम से बाहर की पेशकश की जा सकती है और अभी भी एक प्रामाणिक प्रतिक्रिया हो या, कम से कम, कि प्रामाणिकता के लिए नेतृत्व कर सकते हैं ।
एक ही तर्क दिया जा सकता है, अति प्रयोग के खिलाफ उचित गार्ड को देखते हुए, पूजा में प्रार्थना करने के लिए लागू करने के लिए ।
श्रीमती मेरेल बर्ल्सन, ट्रिनिटी प्रेस्बिटेरियन चर्च, मिडलैंड, टेक्सास, एक कलाकार और कला शिक्षक के एक सदस्य, मुझे मैक्सिकन कला के कुछ प्रकार के बारे में उसे “नीले मनका सिद्धांत” के बारे में बताया ।
उसका सिद्धांत दो अनुभवों से विकसित हुआ ।
पहले उसके कला शिक्षक द्वारा उसे एक टिप्पणी थी जब वह एक बच्चा था ।
के रूप में वह एक परियोजना पर बहुत मेहनत के लिए चीजों को बिल्कुल सही बनाने के लिए, वह कह रही द्वारा उस पर दबाव को कम करने की कोशिश की, “केवल मसीह सही था.”
दूसरा अनुभव हार देखने में रंग मोती के साथ ताना जा रहा था ।
रंग एक बार फिर पैटर्न का गठन किया: काले, पीले, सफेद, बार-बार।
पैटर्न एक अकेले नीले मनका, एक अंतर्निहित दोष, पूर्णता को खराब करने के अलावा एकदम सही था।
दो अनुभवों ने उसे कलाकारों के कार्यों में अन्य “नीले मोती” की तलाश में सेट किया, जानबूझकर खामियां जो अनुस्मारक के रूप में काम कर सकती हैं कि पूर्णता का कोई दिखावा नहीं है।
वह काम करता है जहां पैटर्न स्थापित कर रहे है की बड़ी संख्या में खोजने की रिपोर्ट और, क्या स्पष्ट रूप से सिर्फ एक निरीक्षण नहीं है, पैटर्न टूट गया है ।
“केवल मसीह एकदम सही है.”
शायद अगर पूजा में हमारी प्रार्थना एक सामयिक “नीला मनका” हमें याद दिलाना है कि प्रार्थना सही नहीं है, हमारे लोगों की एक रसीद और उनकी हालत के लिए प्रतिक्रिया के रूप में उन प्रार्थनाओं महसूस होता था ।
यह पूर्वमान है कि पूजा में स्थापित पैटर्न ध्यान से तैयार प्रार्थनाओं में से एक है।
हालांकि यह कोई मतलब नहीं है अजीब प्रार्थना में जानबूझकर निर्माण, यह एक प्रार्थना है कि ठोकर की संभावना खुला छोड़ने के लिए उपयोगी हो सकता है ।
शायद एक प्रार्थना- जैसे कि रोशनी या समर्पण या परस्पर प्रार्थनाओं का एक हिस्सा – पल भर के लिए खुला छोड़ दिया जा सकता है।
या शायद प्रार्थना, समय-समय पर, हमारे सभी प्रार्थनाओं की अपर्याप्तता को स्वीकार कर सकता है ।
आशा है कि हमारे लोगों को सीखना है कि प्रार्थना से पहले वे सिद्ध कर रहे है की पेशकश की जा सकती है ।
भगवान के लिए प्रतिक्रिया
 
अंडरवुड के पहले और तीसरे दिशानिर्देश हमें यह जांचने के लिए कहते हैं कि क्या हमारी प्रार्थनाएं परमेश्वर के लिए प्रतिक्रियाएं हैं और विशेष रूप से, इंजील के परमेश्वर के लिए।
संक्षिप्तता के प्रयोजनों के लिए, मैं इन दो दिशा निर्देशों को एक के रूप में मानता हूं: हमारी प्रार्थनाओं को इंजील के देवता के लिए प्रामाणिक प्रतिक्रियाएं होने की आवश्यकता है।
बेंच में लोगों द्वारा “पढ़ी प्रार्थना” की अक्सर सुनी गई आलोचना को गंभीरता से लेने की जरूरत है ।
क्या है कि आलोचना के लिए लंग्स जरूरी प्रार्थना या आध्यात्मिक प्रदर्शनवाद में एक सहज वाहवाही नहीं है; यह कुछ अर्थ के लिए पूछ रहा हो सकता है कि प्रार्थना भगवान के लिए एक प्रामाणिक प्रतिक्रिया कर रहे हैं।
वहां भाषण और आवाज के टन की शैलियों जो जीवन और भागीदारी के कुछ भी नहीं संवाद और जो एक मात्र गति के माध्यम से जा रहा संकेत कर रहे हैं ।
मुझे लगता है, यह आवाज और मोड़ है कि ध्वनि “ईमानदार की कुछ विशेषताओं को प्रोत्साहित करके इस समस्या से निपटने के लिए बोधगम्य है.”
कि कई खतरों चला: एक काल्पनिक प्रामाणिकता बनाने की कोशिश कर रहा है और एक प्रदर्शन के रूप में प्रार्थना को बढ़ावा देने, दूसरों के बीच में होगा ।
एकमात्र विकल्प जो मैं प्रार्थनाओं के हेरफेर को देख सकता हूं, वह हम में से उन लोगों का एक बहुत ही व्यक्तिगत सवाल पूछना है जो प्रार्थनाओं का नेतृत्व करते हैं: क्या पूजा में हमारी प्रार्थनाएं भगवान के लिए प्रामाणिक प्रतिक्रियाएं हैं?
इस संबंध में डॉ.
अंडरवुड के “पकड़ो 22” को संक्षिप्त किया जा सकता है: पूजा में कोई प्रार्थना नहीं है जो पूजा से पहले शुरू नहीं हुई है।
यदि पूजा में प्रार्थना हमारी एकमात्र प्रार्थना है, तो इसमें प्रामाणिक होने की संभावना कम है।
यह मांग है कि हम अपने निजी जीवन और पूजा में हमारी प्रार्थनाओं के बीच संबंध पर कुछ ध्यान देना ।
यह आवश्यक नहीं है कि यह निजी प्रार्थना सही या अनुकरणीय भी हो; हम सब महसूस कर साझा, मुझे संदेह है, कि हमारी प्रार्थना जीवन अपर्याप्त है ।
हालांकि, यह एक दिशानिर्देश और चुनौती के रूप में खड़ा करता है: हमें उम्मीद नहीं है कि पूजा में हमारी प्रार्थनाएं भगवान के प्रति प्रतिक्रियाएं होंगी (या महसूस की जाएंगी) जब तक कि प्रतिक्रिया निजी रूप से अच्छी तरह से अभ्यास न हो।
निजी और सार्वजनिक प्रार्थनाओं के बीच इस निरंतरता की कल्पना करने के विभिन्न तरीके हैं।
कुछ किस्मों को पूजा में प्रार्थना के तीन रूपों को देखकर संकेत दिया जा सकता है जो लोगों के लिए नेता द्वारा बोली जाती हैं: सहज प्रार्थना, दूसरों द्वारा लिखी गई प्रार्थना, और स्वयं तैयार प्रार्थना।
सहज प्रार्थना
सहज प्रार्थना के खतरे स्पष्ट हैं: जब वे प्रार्थना करने वाले को सहज महसूस कर सकते हैं, तो वे अक्सर स्टॉक प्रार्थना क्लिच के फेरबदल की तरह लगते हैं; इसके अलावा वे पूजा की प्रार्थना में महत्वपूर्ण तत्वों को नजरअंदाज करते हैं क्योंकि इन “पल की प्रेरणा” पर के बारे में सोचा नहीं जाता है ।
उन खतरों में से कुछ को कम कर रहे हैं, लेकिन, अगर सहज प्रार्थना पूजा नेता के निजी प्रार्थना जीवन का हिस्सा है ।
उस विधा में, एक संवेदनशीलता जो अधिक काम वाले वाक्यांशों से बचती है, विकसित की जा सकती है, और प्रार्थना के बुनियादी तत्वों को शामिल करने की आदतों को अच्छी तरह से अभ्यास किया जा सकता है।
यदि पूजा में सहज प्रार्थना प्रार्थना की इस शैली के लंबे उपयोग में गहराई से निहित नहीं है, हालांकि, यह शायद ही भगवान के लिए एक प्रामाणिक प्रतिक्रिया प्रतीत होगा।
पूजा में सहज प्रार्थना के साथ, नेता को भी मंडली में लोगों से कुछ प्रतिक्रिया की व्यवस्था करने की जरूरत है कि कैसे इन प्रार्थनाओं को सुना जा रहा है ।
जो एक आशुलभ प्रार्थना आवाज शब्दों को एक तरह से इरादा हो सकता है, लेकिन लोगों को उंहें तरीके से पूरी तरह से अलग सुन सकते हैं ।
उदाहरण के लिए, जो व्यक्ति वाक्यांशों का उपयोग करते हैं जैसे “मैं सिर्फ आपको धन्यवाद देना चाहता हूं … ” या “मैं सिर्फ प्रार्थना करता हूं कि … “अच्छी तरह से विनम्रता पर प्रयास के रूप में वाक्यांशों का इरादा हो सकता है, दिखावा से परहेज ।
हालांकि, ये वाक्यांश दूसरों पर प्रहार कर सकते हैं, क्योंकि उस विनम्रता पर अनुचित ध्यान देना या यहां तक कि प्रार्थना की वास्तविकता का अवमूल्यन करना।
प्रार्थना के रूप में कैसे प्रार्थना सुनी जाती है, यह प्रतिक्रिया प्रार्थना के रूप की परवाह किए बिना उपयोगी है; यह महत्वपूर्ण है जब कि प्रार्थना सहज है।
दूसरों द्वारा लिखी गई प्रार्थनाएं
दूसरों के द्वारा लिखी गई प्रार्थनाओं का उपयोग करने के खतरों का नाम लेना आसान है: एक रटने टुकड़ी में शब्दों को पढ़ने का प्रलोभन, प्रार्थना के अपने जीवन के विकल्प के रूप में इन प्रार्थनाओं का उपयोग करना।
हालांकि, अगर नेता की अपनी प्रार्थना जीवन दूसरों के द्वारा इन प्रार्थनाओं के उपयोग में समृद्ध है, तो इन प्रार्थनाओं की संभावना पूजा में जीवित होगी।
एक निजी प्रार्थना जीवन है कि दूसरों की प्रार्थना द्वारा निर्देशित है विशेष प्रार्थना है कि और अधिक आसानी से एक ही और कुछ प्रार्थना है कि दर्द होता है और लोगों की उंमीदों को आवाज देने में उपयोगी हो जाएगा बनाया है की खोज करेंगे ।
जब इन प्रार्थनाओं से पहले प्रार्थना की गई है, वे निश्चित रूप से पूजा में भगवान के लिए प्रामाणिक प्रतिक्रियाओं के रूप में महसूस किया जा सकता है ।
यह बहाना नहीं है, तथापि, प्रार्थना की एक किताब हथियाने पांच मिनट सेवा से पहले और कुछ हमें लगता है कि हम पिछले हफ्ते का उपयोग नहीं किया हमें लोगों की प्रार्थना के माध्यम से मिलता है का चयन ।
स्वयं तैयार प्रार्थनाएं
पूजा के लिए अपनी प्रार्थनाओं को तैयार करने के अनुशासन में अन्य दो रूपों की तुलना में कम आवश्यक खतरे हो सकते हैं।
सबसे स्पष्ट खतरा तैयारी इतना कम समय है कि यह कुछ नोटों से थोड़ा अधिक के होते है जो अस्पताल में है में से एक को याद दिलाना है ।
एक दूसरा खतरा है, शायद अक्सर सामना नहीं किया, लेकिन फिर भी असली, प्रार्थना पर बहुत समय बिताने से आता है, लेकिन उंहें इतना आत्म होशपूर्वक सुंदर है कि ध्यान शब्दों के बजाय प्रार्थना का ध्यान करने के लिए कहा जाता है ।
सबसे अक्सर अपराधी मित्रवादी शब्दों के तार होते हैं जो कुछ भी नहीं दिखाते हैं और समानताएं इतनी ग्राफिक होती हैं कि विचित्र हो।
उन खतरों के दोनों से बचा जाता है जब पूजा में प्रार्थना निजी में प्रार्थना से बाहर बढ़ता है ।
एक तरीका है कि एक प्रार्थना डायरी जिसमें वाक्यांश, वाक्य, यहां तक कि पूर्ण प्रार्थना है कि निजी प्रार्थना के एक विशेष समय से बाहर आया रखा जाता है का उपयोग करने के लिए है ।
प्रार्थना की ऐसी डायरी एक संसाधन के रूप में काम कर सकती है जिसमें से प्रार्थनाओं के उन तत्वों का चयन किया जा सकता है जो कॉर्पोरेट पूजा में फिट बैठते हैं।
पूजा के लिए अपनी प्रार्थनाओं को तैयार करने में, बोले गए कंटेंट के लिए लेखन किया जाना चाहिए।
लेखन प्रक्रिया का एक हिस्सा जोर से लिखित प्रार्थना बोलने के क्रम में ंयायाधीश के लिए शामिल है, न केवल अगर वे समझ बनाने के लिए, लेकिन यह भी अगर वे हो सकता है जब बात की, भगवान के लिए प्रामाणिक प्रतिक्रियाओं और लोगों के लिए ।
बोले गए परीक्षण प्रेरित संशोधन और अस्वीकृति का अवसर हो सकते हैं।
इस लेख में प्रतिबिंब एक ऐसी घटना पर निशाना साधते हैं जिसे नियंत्रित, हेरफेर या गारंटीकृत नहीं किया जा सकता है।
आशय और आशा है कि हमारी कॉर्पोरेट पूजा में प्रार्थना में बोले गए शब्दों को नेता सहित प्रार्थना करने वालों के जीवन के साथ इतना प्रतिध्वनित हो सकता है कि वे वर्तमान समय में भगवान की वास्तविकता का दावा करते हैं और एक वफादार प्रतिक्रिया देते हैं।

The Worship Environment at Christmas

Will the parish Christmas decorations show good liturgical sense? Here are some guidelines for planning the worship environment for the Christmas season.

Decorations should not be limited to the area around the altar, ambo (pulpit), and chair. To do so creates a stage setting. Keep this area free from distraction by limiting the floral arrangements around the altar and by placing crèche figures elsewhere. Hackneyed decorations, such as masses of poinsettias or wreaths hung on every pillar, though beautiful in themselves, can have a numbing effect. Such overkill also obscures what these decorations signify.

First determine how you will embellish the assembly area, especially in the space over everyone’s heads. Then determine where more “intimate,” deeply traditional elements will be put—an apple-hung fir tree, a large suspended globe of intersecting wreaths, a place for the icons of the Christmastime feasts, the Bethlehem scene. These things are best located where they can be visited and contemplated before or after worship—near the baptistery or the gathering area or a shrine.

The most serious problem facing all parish ministers in preparing the Christmas season is the schizophrenia of the parish in early January when its church building is clad in red, white, and green but the homes of the parishioners (and the parish school) have already been stripped of their finery. Under such circumstances, worship is a sham. Liturgical ministers can’t begin to do their jobs unless they also help the parish live the Christian calendar at home as well as in church.

Wasting money and resources on decorations is certainly offensive. However, equally offensive is the notion that miserliness in worship somehow reflects the gospel. The gospel doesn’t demand that we pretend to be poor, but that we break down the barriers between rich and poor. If ethnic customs are any gauge, the poor know the value of flamboyant festival excess. Communal celebration means the pooling of resources to enable those who live in everyday simplicity to share in festival abundance. Fasting begets feasting. Perhaps we shouldn’t judge celebrations by the money spent but by the efforts invested by rich and poor alike, all made able to contribute their gifts and talents to one another.

The whole notion of decorating for Christmastime creates unique problems with few easy solutions. For example, at this season, any exceptional effort in liturgy, such as fine music or decorations, has the potential for coming off as just another holiday extravaganza. Yet Christmastime, especially in its full flowering at Epiphany, calls forth the “brightest and best” the parish can muster (although that should never turn into something pompous or triumphalistic).

The evergreens, flowers, or lights—anything you might use to grace Christmas worship—runs the risk of reminding people of a shopping mall, of appearing to glorify money and power. Ironically, the more beautiful and well-executed the Christmas worship environment is, the more it is likely to remind some parishioners of commercial displays. This is an unsolvable dilemma, exacerbated by many Christians’ lack of appreciation for their own symbols.

Opening Up Our Images

Environment ministers—those folks entrusted with the care and keeping of the material things of the liturgy—have a responsibility to open up for parishioners the meaning of the images of Christmas. While trees, wreaths, lights, and holiday foods we see everywhere in December have various meanings to many people, we often forget that Christians have found specifically Christian meanings in these symbols and held them dear for centuries.

If we ask ourselves what a tinseled tree or an evergreen wreath or even a plum pudding has to do with the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem, we’re likely to be stymied. But if we ask what these things have to do with the union of heaven and earth, with time dissolving into timelessness, with the everlasting presence of Emmanuel, God with us, then perhaps we will find our answers.

The bright tree is our return to paradise. With greenery and flowers, winter melts into Eden’s endless spring. Fruit cakes represent the harvest of justice. Eggnog is the milk and honey of the promised land. Sending cards hastens the ingathering of all people. Mistletoe heralds the coming of the Prince of Peace. Lights strung around our doors welcome all the world to the homecoming of heaven.

Each of these holy signs can offer comfort and joy, and they can also offer a tremendous challenge. Like the prophets, like John raging in the wilderness, our Christmas symbols can threaten us to open our doors to those who have no feast, to restore this good earth to the freshness of Eden, to labor long to bring about the reign of justice and compassion. Holy signs are always a two-edged sword.

Even the crèche is not so much a representation of a birth long ago and far away, but the birth that is to be, of the “hopes and fears of all the years,” when the poor and the rich will stand side by side with animals and angels, offering themselves each to the other, lost in wonder and praise, the circle of the saints surrounding the Lamb.

The Use of the Arts in Christmas Worship

The arts during Christmas may symbolize the Incarnation and thus speaks in a profound way to the meaning of “God with us.” Adapt the suggestions below to local customs.

1. The greening of the church done for Advent remains through the Christmas season.

2. The Advent wreath remains hung during Christmas with all five candles lit. Adorn the wreath with a Christmas bow and change all the candles to white.

3. Dramatize the lighting of the five candles as a symbol of the presence of Christ at the beginning of the service by using the Service of the Light for the Acts of Entrance.

4. Make both the processional and the recessional expressions of great joy with persons bearing banners, crosses, incense, and with dancers who express the great joy of Christmas.

5. Proclaim one of the Scripture readings with drama, storytelling, or creative antiphonal reading.

6. For Christmas Eve, incorporate the blessing of the crèche.

A Brief History of Dance in Worship

Christian dance has persisted throughout the history of the church, despite many official decrees against it. Christian churches that have incorporated dance and other stylized gestures in worship have benefited from a profound way of expressing their praise and enacting the gospel message. Dance as worship is one manifestation of the Spirit’s ongoing activity in the church.

The New Testament church was not born into a vacuum, but into a Jewish culture filled with heritage and saturated with rich traditions. T. W. Manson has commented: The first disciples were Jews by birth and upbringing, and it is a priori probable that they would bring into the new community some at least of the religious usages to which they had long been accustomed. (T. W. Manson, quoted in Ralph P. Martin, Worship in the Early Church [Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1974], 19)

Christianity entered into a tradition of already existing patterns of worship, including music and dance, as found recorded in both the Bible and ancient writings.

King David danced exuberantly in God’s presence (2 Sam. 6), while Miriam the prophetess led the women to dance with tambourines in response to their mighty deliverance from the pursuing Egyptian army (Exod. 15). Women are seen dancing in Shiloh at a feast (Judg. 21:21–23) and before David as a response to his military victories (1 Sam. 29:5). Visual images show both the bride and the bridegroom dancing: he leaping in dance (Song 2:8) and she as two dancing companies or armies with banners (Song 6:13). The Psalter commands the dance (Ps. 149:3; Ps. 150:4).

Other writings provide accounts of dancing in Jewish history. The Mishna describes a major ceremony of Sukkot, the seventh and final feast of the Jewish sacred year celebrating God’s rains and the increase of crops. The ritual is called Nissuch Ha-Mayin, in Hebrew meaning the water drawing. “The water-drawing ceremony was a joyous occasion, replete with grand activity and high drama” (Mitch and Zhava Glaeser, The Fall Feasts of Israel [Chicago: Moody Press, 1987], 175). “Levitical priests, worshipers, liturgical flutists, trumpeters, and a crowd carrying lulax (branches) and etrog (fruit) celebrated together in a great display of symbolic activity and festival rejoicing” (Sukkah 5:1). It was probably the viewing of this ceremony to which Jesus makes reference in his great teaching on the outpouring of the Holy Spirit in John 7:37–39.

Another celebration, which occurred on the first night of the feast of Sukkot, was the illumination of the Temple. Enormous golden candlesticks were set up in the court of the women.

The mood was festive. Pious men, members of the Sanhedrin, and heads of the different religious schools would dance well into the night holding burning torches and singing songs of praise to God. (M. and Z. Glaeser, Fall Feasts of Israel, 182)

The Glaesers go on to report: “Not only did they play instruments with fervor, but the Levitical choir stood chanting and singing as the leaders of Israel danced” (M. and Z. Glaeser, Fall Feasts of Israel, 183).

Dr. Sam Sasser writes: Recognized Norwegian scholar Sigmund Mowinckel, in what is believed to be one of the best books written on the Psalms in Israel’s worship, and a standard text in most graduate schools and seminaries, notes in definition: “Together with song and music goes the dance, which is a common way of expressing the encounter with the body. The dance is a spontaneous human expression of the sense of rapture.… At a higher religious level it develops into an expression of the joy at the encounter with the Holy One, an act for the glory of God (2 Sam. 6:20ff). It behooves one to give such a visible and boisterous expression of the joy before Yahweh.” (Sam Sasser, The Priesthood of the Believer [Plano, Tex.: Fountain Gate Publishers], 111)

The church from A.D. 30 to A.D. 70 was undergoing transition. There was a separation from Temple worship, and those elements in the old covenant which would not be continued in the new covenant. The epistles and the book of Acts outline the forms and ceremonies of Judaic worship that would be eliminated in the church. Blood sacrifice (Heb. 9), Levitical priesthood (Heb. 7:11–28), the practice of circumcision (Acts 15:5, 28–29), and the keeping of new moons and Sabbaths (Col. 2:16–23) were to be discontinued. However, there is no commentary about discontinuing the use of musical instruments, singing, and dancing. Nowhere are these condemned or forbidden. On the contrary, the following Scriptures seem to indicate the continuing practice of inherited worship patterns (Col. 3:16; Eph. 5:19–20; Acts 15:13–16; 1 Cor. 5:13, 14:26).

It is noteworthy that historically the book of Psalms has been the basic hymnbook for the church and her worship patterns, as David Chilton describes: When the church sang the Psalms—not just little snatches of them, but comprehensively, through the whole Psalter—she was strong, healthy, aggressive, and could not be stopped. That’s why the devil has sought to keep us from singing the Psalms, to rob us of our inheritance. If we are to recapture the eschatology of dominion, we must reform the church; and a crucial aspect of that reformation should be a return to the singing of Psalms. (David Chilton, Paradise Restored [Tyler, Tex.: Reconstruction Press, 1985], 8-9)

Although Jewish tradition is replete with accounts of dancing, Ecclesiastes 3:1 and 4 states, “To everything there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven / A time to weep, and a time to laugh; a time to mourn, and a time to dance.” The New Testament church was soon to experience seasons of mourning and weeping. Lamentations 5:15 says: “The joy of our heart is ceased; our dance is turned to mourning.” Laughing and dancing would again find their season in the church as God brought times of restoration, healing, and revival. Jeremiah 31:4 promises, “Again I will build thee, and thou shalt be built, O virgin of Israel: thou shalt be adorned with thy tabrets, and shall go forth in the dances of them that make merry.”

Separation from Jewish heritage was not the only point of adaptation for the new church. Until the time of Constantine, a.d. 323, the church experienced extreme persecution at the hands of the Roman government. Christians were captured, used as human torches, compelled to fight in gladiatorial combat, and fed to lions in elaborate spectacles called Roman games. The games reflected the immoral decadence, monstrous abuses, unwieldy influence, and imperial sadism into which Rome had fallen. Incorporated into these games was the Roman dance, an art form borrowed from other cultures, mainly Greek, and consigned to slaves.

Christians had seen their friends and fathers martyred in amphitheaters where their agony was merely a prelude to, or an incident in, the shows. That the church Fathers would honestly have denied any desire to employ consciously a trace of taint from Roman spectacle we have no reason to doubt. Church history is full of the courageous and violent denunciations that the early Fathers launched against the shows.

As early as a.d. 300 a council at Elvera decided that no person in any way connected with circus or pantomime could be baptized. In 398, at the Council of Carthage, a rule was established excommunicating anyone who attended the theater on holy days (Lincoln Kirstein, Dance: A Short History of Classic Theatrical Dancing [Little Rock: Revival Press, 1982], 59-60).

Although church history of the first millennium finds the weight of evidence to be in opposition to dance, there are quotes from writings of the church fathers which indicate some trace of dancing remained in the Christian church.

  • “Of those in heaven and those on earth, a unison is made, one General Assembly, one single service of thanksgiving, one single transport of rejoicing, one joyous dance.” Chrysostom (a.d. 386)
  • “Everything is right when it springs from the fear of the Lord. Let’s dance as David did. Let’s not be ashamed to show adoration of God. Dance uplifts the body above the earth into the heavenlies. Dance bound up with faith is a testimony to the living grace of God. He who dances as David dances, dances in grace.” Ambrose (a.d. 390)
  • “To keep the sacred dances, discipline is most severe.” Augustine (a.d. 394)
  • “Could there be anything more blessed than to imitate on earth the dance of angels and saints? To join our voices in prayer and song to glorify the risen creator.” Bishop of Caesarea (a.d. 407)
  • “I see dance as a virtue in harmony with power from above.” Thodoret (a.d. 430)
  • “Dance as David danced.” Bishop of Milan (a.d. 600)
  • “Dance as David to true refreshment of The Ark which I consider to be the approach to God, the swift encircling steps in the manner of mystery.” St. Gregory of Nazianzus (a.d. 600) (all quoted from Debbie Roberts, Rejoice: A Biblical Study of the Dance [Little Rock: Revival Press, 1982], 39-40)

In his book on dance, Lincoln Kirstein records a few examples of dancing in Christian churches: The Abbot Meletius, an Englishman, upon the advice of the first Gregory, permitted dancing in his churches up to 604.… The Jesuit father Menestrier, whose history of dancing published in 1682 is full of valuable data about his own time as well as of curious earlier tales, tells of seeing in certain Parish churches the senior canon leading choirboys in a round dance during the singing of the psalm. The Parish Liturgy reads “Le chanoine ballera au premier psaume.” (“The canon will dance to the first psalm.”) (Kirstein, Dance, 63)

Continuing in this vein, Kirstein records three more examples: Scaliger said the first Roman bishops were called praesuls and they led a sacred “dance” around altars at festivals. Theodosius says that Christians of Antioch danced in church and in front of martyrs’ tombs. Los Seises, the dancing youths of the Cathedral of Seville, whose annual performance on the feasts of Corpus Christi and the Immaculate Conception was connected with the ancient Mozarabic rite, are often described as ritual dancers, though their dance was really an independent votive act, peculiar to the towns of Seville and Toledo. (Ibid.)

The writings of Augustine in the fourth century issue a complaint against dancing: It is preferable to till the soil and to dig ditches on the day of the Lord than to dance a choreic reigen. Oh, how times and manners change! What once was the business of lute players and shameless women only, namely to sing and to play, this is now considered an honor among Christian virgins and matrons who even engage masters in their art to teach them. (Walter Sorell, The Dance through the Ages [New York: Grosset and Dunlap, 1967], 36)

On the one hand, condemned and on the other hand embraced, dance seems to have never completely disappeared from church history. Especially in the Mediterranean countries and the Orient, people never gave up dancing. Here, the clergy applied less coercive measures to restrain dance. However, taking the gospel to the north, the clergy had an uphill struggle to uproot the rituals and pagan rites.

With the Christian way of life taking root, the heathen quality was lost, but the people retained what they liked about the old way. How many things in which we still indulge nowadays have their roots in ancient pagan rituals, such as the idea of a June bridge, Halloween, or Yuletide! Or who would think today of the Maypole as a phallic symbol and of the dance around it as a fertility dance? (Ibid., 38)

Although dance was more often condemned by the millennium church than sanctioned, there were exceptions. As Alordyce Nicole writes, in his exhaustive work on the period, had this been actually enforced half of Christendom, including a section of the clergy, would have been out of communion with the church.… From East to West, in Constantinople, in Antioch, in Alexandria, in Rome, the mimic drama flourished, uniting together old pagans and new Christians in the one common enjoyment of pure secularism. (Kirstein, Dance, 60)

Because of the increase in heresy, the leaders desired more centralization of authority and a set pattern of doctrine. A series of traceable events, beyond the scope of this article, gave rise to priestly class and eventually the formation of the Roman Catholic church.

From the scriptural position of the priesthood of all believers there grew up a distinct priestly class.… The early leaders warned against falling from this idea, but soon a priestly class was developed and the priests began to do things for common Christians that, they were told, they could not do for themselves. This was not only a retrogression to Jewish days, but was also a compromise with paganism. If the ministers were to be priests they had to interpret the items of worship in such a way as to give themselves special functions and to justify their position.… Along with these developments was a general increase of ceremonialism. Simple services became ritualistic. (F. W. Mattox, The Eternal Kingdom [Delight, Ark.: Gospel Light Publishing House, 1961], 151)

Combining the practice of asceticism and the sharp cleavage between clergy and laity, this period finds little expression of dance in the church; and what can be found is in the ceremony and service of the priests. Hence, the rise of the Mass. The Mass is based on Christ’s passion. It is called Eucharist or Thanksgiving, since those celebrating give thanks for the bread and wine. The Mass continued to be arranged until it supported “an astonishing exuberance of minute detail, each tiny point related to a central truth of the religion” (Kirstein, Dance, 70).

The expression of one’s beliefs and feelings through movement is the very foundation of dance. Though the worship form of dance was removed from the people and repressed in the priesthood, the basic elements of dance found its expression in the Mass. It is the indirect contribution of the Mass with which we are occupied but even so, there were definite preordained movements and postures for the participants. However, we do not infer nor should we “easily assume that basilicas were sacred opera houses, or the Mass was a holy pantomime” (Ibid., 67). But dancing as a form of worship is not an isolated phenomenon or an ancient relic of our distant Hebraic ancestors. Therefore, we must understand the forms worship may take when it emerges as the dance.

  • Outside the walls of the church, people were still expressing religion in dance, although their belief was more a fear of death than faith in the living God that prompted Israel’s dance.
  • In no other epoch besides the late Middle Ages has the dance been more indicative of social phenomena. It reflected frightening aspects of the plague and the fear of death.
  • At Christian festivals people would suddenly begin to sing and dance in churchyards, disturbing divine service.
  • Hans Christian Anderson tells of little Karen who was cursed to dance without stopping and who could not find rest until the executioner cut off her feet. (Sorell, Dance through the Ages, 40, 42)

The church leaders tried to stamp out these obscene dances, which often began in the churchyard cemetery with people dancing around tombstones then moving through the town attracting more and more people as they went. This dance, also known as the dance macabre, reached a climax as the bubonic plague swept Europe in the fourteenth century. These dances of violent nature occurred everywhere. In Germany, they were called St. Vitus’ dance. In Italy, it was called tarantella and these dances indicated the tenor of life, particularly during the period of the plague (Ibid., 40).

The clergy maintained that the millennium would be the day of reckoning, Judgment Day. When the year 1000 passed without any visible changes, some of the fear subsided.

The Church remained powerful and the spirit of medievalism lingered on, even while man awakened to new inner freedom. From the crudeness of his carnal lust and mortal fear of it, he escaped into chivalry; checking his growing freedom, he forced himself into the straitjacket of ideal codes. (Sorell, Dance through the Ages, 39)

The fourteenth-century introduced more change for the world and the church with the beginning of the Renaissance, the great revival of art and learning in Europe in the fourteenth, fifteenth, and sixteenth centuries. The world was revolting to set the soul and body free.

Above all, Renaissance man had a visual mind, as his accomplishments in printing, sculpture, and architecture prove. The eye became used to seeing in patterns. And it was a geometric design that inspired the first attempts at ballet. (Ibid., 90)

The Renaissance, emphasizing the dignity of the human person, laid the foundation for independence of thought which eventually broke the grip of Catholic theology. A revitalized interest in the study of the Scriptures caused people to be aware that the New Testament church was vastly different from the church in existence in Western Europe.

The religious and moral corruptions now could be effectively combated because of the intellectual freedom which had been encouraged by the Renaissance. Men began to see in the Scripture that the claims of the clergy were unfounded, and with a new intellectual basis for their criticism, ideas of opposition to the hierarchy spread rapidly. (F. W. Mattox, Eternal Kingdom, 240)

The sixteenth-century began the Reformation. Notable leaders sought to eliminate the unscriptural doctrines and practices of the Catholic church and, through reforms, return the church to New Testament patterns. One of the first reformers was Martin Luther (1483–1546). Along with emphasizing justification by faith, Luther stressed the priesthood of all believers. This was a preeminent step to releasing the people to express their worship unto God, which would eventually release all the Davidic expressions of praise, including dance.

John Calvin (1509–1564) was a leader of the Reformation in Switzerland who laid down principles that have influenced a large part of the Protestant world today.

The church of Luther experienced and preached the ideal of renunciation of the world more strongly than the Reformed church, which desires to proclaim the glory of God in all areas of life. The Reformed Churches do not view this world as a vale of tears but as the vineyard of the Lord, which is to be cultivated. They do not shun the world, but meet it, accepting the danger of becoming secularized in order to magnify God’s name within it and by its means. Thus in the last analysis, they subject nothing to a judgment of absolute condemnation. Everything must and can serve to the glorification of God, even art. We may recall the thought of the Neo-Calvinist Abraham Kuyper. Basically, the art of the dance should also be capable of being incorporated into the service of God. (Gerardus Van Der Leeuw, Religion in Essence and Manifestation [Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1986], 51-52)

Writings on the Renaissance and Reformation periods are scattered with accounts of a revitalized interest in dance in the church. Giovanni Boelaccio of the fourteenth century mentioned the carole, a dance in a ring to singing voices, originally performed in May only, but whose popularity grew until the carole was sung and danced throughout the year.

Variations of the carole arose everywhere. The minnesingers in Germany called it Springtang and put into it a great many hops and small leaps.… The people identified the carole—today known only as a Christmas song—with religious images as they appear in many “Last Judgment” paintings of the early Renaissance which show angels in heaven enjoying a carole. (Sorell, Dance through the Ages, 41)

The varied artistic styles of the Renaissance reflect the concept of dancing in the heavens. The works of Leonardo da Vinci pictured the entire cosmic order as dancing. Dante, a famous writer, poet, moral philosopher, and political thinker of his day saw the dance of the saints in heaven.

When those bright suns so gloriously singing
Had circled three items ‘round about us turning,
Like stars which closely ‘round the pole go swinging,
They seemed like women who are not yet willing
To dance, but to the melody stand clinging
While the new rhythm mind and ear is filling.
(Van Der Leeuw, Religion, 30)

The works of Vondel reveal the same visual imagery:

… for the guests so merry
At the wedding, must not rest,
Since their dance is necessary.
Heaven holds no ghost nor quest
Who with holy dance and singing
Does not spend eternity.…
(Van Der Leeuw, Religion, 30)

Vondel also sees how the church dances with God:

As air through many organ pipes is guided
One spirit is to many tongues divided,
In equal time through a field of equal sound,
Where Church and God together dance the sound.
The angel hosts from heaven’s height descending
Dance deeply down, our sacrifice attending,
About Christ’s body on His altar-stone.…
(Van Der Leeuw, Religion, 30)

Apparently, the prevailing philosophy embraced dancing in heaven. “To die on earth as a martyr brings heavenly joy.… In Fra Angelico’s The Last Judgment, the virgins and martyrs dance the heavenly dance” (Van Der Leeuw, Religion, 68). Luther, describing heaven’s garden for his young song, portrays “a small beautiful meadow, which was arrayed for a dance. There hung lutes, pipes, trumpets, and beautiful silver cymbals” (Van Der Leeuw, Religion, 68). Although the church may have somewhat embraced the concept of dancing in heaven, the practice of dancing on earth was, for the most part, shunned if not declared anathema.

No longer under the heavy restraints of the church, Renaissance society was, therefore, dancing. Two opposite poles of dance developed in Europe between the twelfth and fourteenth centuries: the peasants, or the populace at large, stood for the earthiness and crude joy, while the nobility replaced the primary impulses with refinement and polish. “The court dance was subjected more and more to rules. Contributing to this development was, no doubt, the reliance of the nobility on professional entertainers” (Sorrel, Dance through the Ages, 45).

Further refinements and more popularity came to dance because of Catherine de Medici, a daughter of a great house in Italy who came to France to marry Henry II. “She brought with her a company of musicians and dancers from her native city of Florence to supervise her artistic presentations, and highly impressive they were” (John Martin, The Book of Dance [New York: Tudor Publishing Company, 1963], 26). In 1581, with the expertise of Balthasar de Beaujoyeux (an Italian by birth though bearing a French name), Catherine de Medici produced what is considered the first ballet, Ballet Comigue de la Rein.

The populace was also dancing. Folk dances such as the egg dance, the country Thread-the-Needle, and ring-shaped or choral dances grew in popularity. Labyrinth dances signifying resurrection themes were popular in many parts of the world, sometimes even being incorporated into Christian holidays. At Easter, in the province of Twente, in Oatmarsum, the children danced or processed through the entire town in a serpentine motion singing a very old Easter song:

Hallelujah! The happy melody
Is now sung loud and prettily.
Hallelujah! Hallelujah!

This dance is sluip-door-kruip-door in Dutch, Magdeburger in German, forandole in French, and the cramignon of Limburg. These also had two other names, taken from Biblical antiquity and the classics: Jericho and labyrinth.

From the Reformation period until the present, the church has experienced many spiritual awakenings or revivals, including the restoration of many New Testament truths. The energies of the clergy, theologians, and even whole denominations has been to embrace and preserve the truths that were being revealed. If the loss of truth or the embrace of heresy propelled the church into the dark ages (which is the prevailing philosophy of church historians), then the converse is also true. Embracing truth is responsible for returning the church to her calling, commission, and glory. Scripture compares truth to walls and salvation (Isa. 26:11; 60:18; Ps. 51:18). The rebuilding of truth is analogous to the rebuilding of the walls of Jerusalem after captivity, defeat, and judgment (Ezra 9:9; Neh. 2:17; Isa. 26:1). In Israel of old, such restoration was the promised season of release, rejoicing, and dance (Jer. 31:1–13; Neh. 7:1; 12:27–30). Likewise, as the church has experienced reforming and rebuilding, rejoicing and dancing have accompanied each season of restoration. (Below you will find quotes from various revival periods and special religious sects that validate this view.)

A unique group called the Shakers was founded in England in 1747. The term Shaker came from the rapid up-and-down movement of their hands, mostly in their wrists. Shaking the hands with the palms turned upward as if to receive a blessing meant they were expressing the open petition, “Come, life Eternal.” Shaking of the hands with the palms turned downward to the floor was a symbolic motion that they were shaking out all that was carnal.

The Shakers believed that by keeping their inner and outer lives in perfect order they were reflecting the perfect order of God’s kingdom. The practicing Shaker was held accountable to his religion when he stepped out of bed, when he dressed, when he ate when he spoke, and when he worked. Worldly lusts were suppressed by rules: carnality was held at bay by a dress code that insured modesty, by a series of orders restricting the body’s movements and appetites, and by architectural designs that segregated the sexes. Unity was enforced by the requirements of obedience—the submission of the individual to the authority of God’s appointed leaders.

On Sundays the Shakers danced to the honor of God. Their worship—in vivid contrast to the restrained order of their weekday lives—was an exuberant spectacle that veered unpredictably through many hours of the day. Formal dances could at any time break off into spontaneous displays of whirling, weeping, and shaking. Scathing or uplifting sermons were delivered extemporaneously by the elders, or by individual worshipers who were suddenly seized by the power of God and compelled to speak. Throngs of spectators—“the world’s people”—packed the little meetinghouses to be entertained, shocked, or inspired. No one who witnessed Shaker worship, whether horrified or enraptured, ever forgot it.

The first ordered dance of the Shakers, the “Square Order Shuffle” was introduced by Joseph Meacham about 1785. In 1820 a variation was introduced, men and women shuffled forward and backward in a series of parallel lines, weaving, in imaginative designs, a fabric of union and love.

A 19th Century American engraving called “Shakers Dancing” can be seen at the Dance Collection, Performing Arts Research Center, The New York Public Library at Lincoln Center. (Amy Stechler Burns and Ken Burns, “The Shakers,” American History Illustrated [Summer 1988], 27)

During the early 1800s in the slave community, dance was an important part of their worship. A syncretism of African and conventional Western religious beliefs, the praise meeting in the quarters was unique in the United States. While whites might be carried away by religious frenzy at occasional “awakenings,” slaves had an even more intense emotional involvement with their God every week. In contrast to most white churches, a meeting in the quarters was the scene of perpetual motion and constant singing. Robert Anderson recalled that in meetings on his plantation there was much singing. He noted, “While singing these songs, the singers and the entire congregation kept time to the music by the swaying of their bodies, or by the patting of the foot or hand. Practically all of their songs were accompanied by a motion of some kind.” A black plantation preacher testified to the uniqueness of the religion in the quarters when he asserted: “The way in which we worshiped is almost indescribable. The singing was accompanied by a certain ecstasy of motion, clapping of hands, tossing of heads, which would continue without cessation about half an hour; one would lead off in a kind of recitative style, others joining in the chorus. The old house partook of the ecstasy; it rang with their jubilant shouts, and shook in all its joints (John W. Blassingame, The Slave Community [New York: Oxford, 1972]: 27). Two outstanding features of the slave community worship were the “ring shout” and the “juba.” H. G. Spaulding gave an excellent description of the “shout” on the Sea Islands in 1863:

After the praise meeting is over, there usually follows the very singular and impressive performance of the “Shout” or religious dance of the negroes. Three or four, standing still, clapping their hands and beating time with their feet, commence singing in unison one of the peculiar shout melodies, while the others walk round in a ring, in single file, joining also in the song. Soon those in the ring leave off their singing, the others keeping it up the while with increased vigor, and strike into the shout step, observing most accurate time with the music. This step is something halfway between a shuffle and a dance, as difficult for an uninitiated person to describe as to imitate. At the end of each stanza of the song the dancers stop short with a slight stamp on the last note, and then, putting the other foot forward, proceed through the next verse.… The shout is a simple outburst and manifestation of religious fervor—a “rejoicing in the Lord”—making a “joyful noise unto the God of their salvation.” (Blassingame, Slave Community, 65–66)

Accompanying their singing was the practice of the “patting juba.”

When slaves had no musical instruments they achieved a high degree of rhythmic complexity by clapping their hands. Solomon Northup, an accomplished slave musician, observed that in juba the clapping involved “striking the hands on the knees, then stroking the hands together, then stroking the right shoulder with one hand, the left with the other—all the while keeping time with the feet, and singing.… ” Often the rhythmic patterns used in juba were little short of amazing. After viewing a performance in Georgia in 1841, a traveler from Rhode Island observed that, while the slaves were patting juba, it was “really astonishing to witness the rapidity of their motions, their accurate time, and the precision of their music and dance.” (Ibid.)

The world was in a period of change. The Industrial Revolution followed the Reformation changing the character of life as people had known it. Likewise, the reformers continued to bring change to the church. The late 1800s produced a church concerned about holiness, some Christians even seeking a second work of grace called sanctification. Holiness evangelist, pastor, and church leader Ambrose Blackman Crumper, a licensed Methodist Episcopal preacher, was determined to establish the holiness message in his native state of North Carolina. “Everywhere he went, people shouted, danced before the Lord, and ‘fell under the Spirit’ when they received the second blessing.”

The Holiness movement spawned the great outpouring of the Holy Spirit at the turn of the century. Pentecostalism was born on Azusa Street, prompted in part by the Great Welsh Revival. Seekers of the baptism of the Holy Spirit would receive the gift of tongues. “Dancing in the spirit” was often a regular happening at their meetings. Dancing in the spirit is physical movement akin to dancing, presumably done while under the influence and control of the Holy Spirit. “Most older Pentecostal believers who have participated in spiritual revivals over a period of years have witnessed what is known as ‘dancing in the spirit’ ” (Stanley M. Burgess and Gary B. McGee, eds., Dictionary of Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements [Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1988], 236). According to the Dictionary of Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements, various phrases applied to the dance movements observed in the Pentecostal believers included: holy roller, orgiastic worship, physical agitation, physically demonstrated praises, orgasmic worship, noisy and expressive worship, holy jumpers, and others.

Dancing is a phenomenon closely tied to the fresh encounters with God found in the message of sanctification, baptism of the Holy Spirit, or healing revivals. One famous woman healing evangelist, Maria Woodworth-Etter, whose meetings journal has many accounts of people dancing, had this to say on the subject:

David danced with all his might before the Lord. The word is full of dancing. Where dancing in the Bible is mentioned, it always signified victory for the Lord’s hosts. It was always done to glorify God. The Lord placed the spirit of power and love of the dance in the Church, and wherever the Scripture speaks of dancing it implies that they danced in inspiration, and were moved by the Spirit, and the Lord was always pleased and smiled His approval, but the devil stole it away and made capital of it. In these last days, when God is pouring out His Spirit in great cloudbursts and tidal waves from the floodgates of Heaven, and the great river of life is flooding our spirit and body, and baptizing us with fire and resurrection life, and divine energy, the Lord is doing His acts, His strange acts, and dancing in the Spirit and speaking in other tongues, and many other operations and gifts. The Holy Ghost is confirming the last message of the coming King, with great signs and wonders, and miracles. If you read carefully what the Scripture says about dancing, you will be surprised and will see that singing, music, and dancing has a humble and holy place in the Lord’s Church.… All the great company was blessed but Michael, and she was stricken with barrenness till the day of her death, so you see she sinned in making light of the power of God in the holy dance (just as some do today), and attributed it to the flesh or the devil. They always lost out, and many are in darkness till death. (Maria Woodworth-Etter, A Diary of Signs and Wonders [Tulsa: Harrison House, 1981], 524-525)

The Pentecostal revival was not limited to the United States, but spread quickly to the European continent, bringing with it the Holy Spirit’s gifts, anointing, and also the dance. Between the two world wars, a revival of Christian drama won wide popularity, especially in Germany.

I shall never forget seeing one of these bands of German young people as they produced a thrilling version of the Totentanz (Dance of Death) before a Chinese student-group in Peking. Being chiefly a dance, with music but no words, it spoke an international language; and the intensity of the emotion among these oriental and largely non-Christian observers aroused by this European and thoroughly Christian play was surprising and extraordinary. (Richard H. Ritter, The Arts of the Church [Boston: The Pilgrim Press, 1947], 97-98)

From that time until the present day, dancing has been incorporated by many evangelistic groups. Currently, two outstanding examples are YWAM (Youth With A Mission), founded by Loren Cunningham, and Toymaker’s Dream by Impact Productions. The year 1948 hosted another outpouring of the Holy Spirit known as the Latter Rain Movement. With a strong emphasis on the gifts of the Holy Spirit, laying on of hands, and prophecy, this visitation, like earlier revivals, hosted manifestations of spiritual dancing. Rev. Charlotte Baker, a modern-day prophet and anointed teacher, comments on that outpouring in her book On Eagle’s Wings: “Dancing is not new to the Christian who is familiar with worship in the realm of Pentecostal churches. Since the outpouring of the Holy Spirit at the turn of the century, dancing in the Spirit has been a part of Pentecostal praise and worship.” However, a shift began to take place in the understanding of teachers such as Charlotte Baker. Although not doubting the validity of dancing while yielded to the Holy Spirit’s influence, she and others also believed dancing as a voluntary act is a true act of worship. She goes on to comment:

It must be noted, however, “dancing in the Spirit,” the term which has been so widely used throughout the years, is not found in God’s Word. Careful study of the Word reveals that the appropriate expression is dancing before the Lord. For example, David danced before the Lord with all his might at the time of the return of the Ark of the Covenant to Israel. “Dancing in the Spirit” suggests that the Holy Spirit takes hold of the Christian, causing him or her to enter into uncontrollable motions and contortions, all supposedly manifestations of the Spirit. “Dancing before the Lord” suggests the worshiper’s strength, training, and expertise as fully under the control of the dancer, who expresses worship and joy in actions and steps which bring pleasure to the heart of God. While it is true that the believer is admonished to “leap for joy,” it is also true that there are many Scriptures that indicate that intricate steps, marches, group dances, twirling, and twisting were part of the expression of the dance. There is a growing conviction among the people of God that He is most pleased when we offer to Him, as an act of worship, all of our ability whether it be in art, in the dance, or in any other creative expression with which the Lord has blessed us. Every activity of life is designed to become an act of worship. In the past five years, we have seen many gifted dancers come to Jesus for salvation and add to the Body of Christ a wonderful ability to express, in an excellent manner, their worship unto Him in dance. Just as there are those who have been given the ability to sing and to edify the Body through excellence in song, so are there those who have been given the ability to pour out to God a similar ministry through the dance. Room should be made within the worship structure of the Church for the full expression of each individual; such expression should always remain within the confines of the Word and under the leadership of the ministries. (Charlotte E. Baker, On Eagle’s Wings [Shippensburg, Pa.: Destiny Image Publishers, 1990], 101-102)

In the 1950s and 60s, a few churches pioneered new territory in choreographed dancing, pageants, dance troupes, and trained artists. Among these was The King’s Temple in Seattle, Washington, pastored by Rev. Charlotte Baker, a disciple of the late Reg. Layzell, and Living Waters Fellowship in Pasadena, California, pastored by Willard and Ione Glaeser.

By the early 1960s, the charismatic renewal movement was building momentum, sweeping people from every denomination into the outpouring of the Holy Spirit. An outstanding feature of the charismatic meetings was the importance placed on singing Psalms and other Scriptures. “The rise of singing psalms and Scripture songs, as well as the rebirth of dance in worship, in the charismatic movement is directly attributed to Old Testament examples” (Burgess and McGee, Dictionary of Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements, 689). Exuberance and freshness marked the worship services: “As in the early days of the Pentecostal revival, it is not unusual to find charismatic worshipers singing, shouting, clapping hands, leaping and even dancing before the Lord as they offer him sincere praise and thanksgiving” (Burgess and McGee, Dictionary of Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements, 693).

In 1978 God raised up four men—Rev. Larry Dempsey, Rev. Barry Griffing, Rev. Steve Griffing, and Rev. David Fisher—to begin a teaching worship conference called the International Worship Symposium. This worship seminar, along with one of its offshoots, and the International Feast of Tabernacles Celebration in Jerusalem have done much to encourage local assemblies to begin creative worship in the area of dance.

Dancing in churches currently ranges from simple folk style steps in which whole congregations participate, to traveling professional artists such as Ballet Magnificat. Liturgical dance, the name having been just recently coined to identify the style of dance, is becoming more common.

Practiced by liturgical artists, dance serves and functions as a conduit from the inner workings of the spirit to the outer expression of today’s worship.… dances for the liturgy change with the seasons: fall, winter, spring, and summer match advent, Christmas/Epiphany, Lent/Easter, and Pentecost. Becoming immersed in the cyclical process, a dancer discovers that he or she has become a student of religion. Dances are designed from personal reflections on the spirituality of the liturgical season. Scripture and prayer, mingled with the urgings of the dancer’s soul, and enriched by the experience of life, are shaped through the medium of dance. (Doug Adams and Diane Apostolos-Cappodona, eds., Dance as Religious Studies [New York: Crossroad, 1990], 153-154)

It appears that there is an inescapable link with restoration and rejoicing, with rebuilding and responding—“going forth in the dances of them that make merry” (Jer. 31:4). Indeed “to everything, there is a season.” The season of weeping over our spiritual captivity has come to an end, for He has “turned our mourning into dancing.”

The Church Building as a Setting for Liturgical Action

The following comments discuss the relationship of the design of the worship space to the actions that take place there. The function and significance of these actions provide the needed guidelines for liturgical architecture.

The church building and setting for the liturgical assembly. Nothing more, but nothing less. Liturgical worship happens in space, and space is shaped into place by the meaning people discover within it. Jews and Christians have shaped space into place by discovering that the Creator abides throughout creation. Christians especially can never forget the spatial concreteness the Incarnation entails. God did not become a movement, a concept, an ideal, or even a committee, but a man of flesh and bone with a parentage, friends, a language, a country, a home. He inhabited not just a time but places, streets, rooms, countrysides, and by his presence in the flesh he changed them all. The memory of this has never died because his continuing presence by grace, faith, and sacrament still does the same in the world through his body, which is the church, enfleshed locally in the liturgical assembly.

It goes counter to Christian instinct, therefore, that the place in which the church assembles should be devoid of all evidence of his presence or that this presence should be regarded as temporary, capricious, or discrete so as not to restrict him or inconvenience the assembly. He restricted himself by becoming incarnate, and the assembly’s only inconvenience is his real absence.

Raw space becomes liturgical place through the change his presence by grace, faith, and sacrament causes. Liturgical place is thus not a monument to the pastor’s tastes or the locale in which the assembly feels most comfortable. Jesus Christ’s incarnate presence caused notable discomfort even for those who loved him best, and he is reported to have resorted to violence on one occasion when faced with the obduracy of the temple clergy’s tastes. Liturgical place belongs to the assembly only because the space it occupies is first his. He alone makes it a place by specifying its meaning as distinct from all others. To this specification the assembly can only be obedient; for it the assembly can only pray even as it cooperates with him by faith in its specification.

What the church building shelters and gives setting for is the faithful assembly, the church, in all its rich diversity of orders from catechumen to penitent, from youngest server to eldest bishop. As it meets for worship of the Source and Redeemer of all, the assembly is the fundamental sacrament of God’s pleasure in Christ on earth. The eucharistic food and drink are the sacred symbol of this ecclesial reality, which Paul calls simply Christ’s body. Christian instinct has been to house this assembly as elegantly as possible, avoiding tents, bedrooms, and school basements.

The assembly uses its place to do something in. This is the liturgy, by which the assembly celebrates the nuptials of all things with their Creator. Because the celebration outstrips being merely an instruction, a pageant, a meditation, a preachment, or an act of therapy, the assembly, as a rule, has kept its place open for movement on the part of all. Furniture is used for a public purpose and for those who find it difficult to stand or move.

The strong and elemental openness of liturgical place makes for dynamism and interest. It is a vigorous arena for conducting public business in which petitions are heard, contracts entered into, relationships witnessed, orations declaimed, initiations consummated, vows taken, authority exercised, laws promulgated, images venerated, values affirmed, banquets attended, votes cast, the dead waked, the Word deliberated, and parades cheered. It is acoustically sonorous, rarely vacant of sound or motion. It possesses a certain disciplined self-confidence as the center of community life both sacred and secular. It is the Italian piazza, the Roman forum, the Yankee town green, Red Square moved under roof and used for the business of faith. It is not a carpeted bedroom where faith may recline privately with the Sunday papers.

Find the most serviceable places for the altar, font, and chair and leave them there. Altars on wheels, fonts that collapse, and presidential chairs that fold away do not free but neuter liturgical place. Since crucial values are perennial rather than disposable, they flock with usage to sustained focal points and thus help to reduce raw space into human place. Crucial values so incarnated become roots for people’s lives. Gymnasia rarely play a profound role in most people’s maintenance of a secure identity.

Altar and font normally should be fixed, elemental, and powerful in their simplicity, free-standing to allow access from all sides, and worthy of the assembly that surrounds them. The amount of space surrounding each should be scaled to the size of the assembly. Neither altar nor font should be so close to the other as to compete for attention or to confuse each other’s purpose, dignity, and quite different kinds of liturgy. The altar is a Table to dine upon. The font is a pool to bathe in, a womb to be born from, a tomb to be buried in. Bathing and dining areas are rarely found in the same room, except in churches.

The presidential chair should be modest but not trivial. It is best located not primarily in reference to the altar but to the assembly, perhaps in an open area in the nave of the church facing both the lectern and altar along with the rest of the assembly. This would shift the ceremonial focus of the liturgy, except for the eucharistic prayer, into the midst of the assembly itself, where it seems to belong given the nature of Christian worship. Outside baptism and the eucharistic banquet, the form this worship normally takes is that of a liturgy of the Word in which the Word is heard and responded to by the whole assembly, ministers included. Locating the ministerial area and the president’s chair in the midst of the assembly may thus be the most versatile arrangement.

As the name implies, the lectern is a reading stand rather than a shrine competing with font and altar. The shrine of the gospel book is the altar. The shrine of the gospel itself is the life of the faithful assembly that celebrates the Word liturgically. The gospel book, which is “sacramental” of all this, is constantly in motion, being carried, held, opened, read from, closed, and laid rather than left somewhere behind votive lights or under lock and key.

The altar and the baptismal font are the primary spatial foci of the liturgy. The altar Table is kept free of contraptions such as elaborate bookstands, pots, cruets, plastic things, electrical apparatus, aids to piety, and the efforts of floral decorators. The book of the Word and the sacrament of the Word are adornment enough.

The baptismal area is kept free of rumpled vestments, cotton wads, stacks of reading material, and folding chairs. The pool itself is kept clean. It contains what is called “living water” not because things grow in it but because it moves to give life to those who lie in death’s bonds.

Liturgical things are designed for the assembly’s purpose. The church building houses the assembly. It is neither a museum for ecclesiastical art nor a pious attic. All it contains should possess a sober splendor congruent with the assembly and its sacred intent.

Bread and wine should be just that, not plastic disks and grape juice, not corn chips and lemonade. The assembly uses bread and wine as food and drink in the Eucharist. These should be present in form, quality, and quantity to correspond with a banquet’s usual liberality, keeping in mind, however, that this banquet’s purpose is not to fill bellies but to give thanks to the Source and Redeemer of all things. The Eucharist, like the Supper that remains its prototype, fills one with more than food, rejoices hearts with more than wine.

Cups, plates, flagons, and bread boxes should be ample. Cluttering the altar with many small cups is logistically and symbolically inelegant. Use one cup of some significance together with a clear glass or crystal flagon large enough to fill smaller cups for Communion later. The same principle holds for the bread plate: Use a single large one from which bread can be transferred to smaller plates for Communion later. The Eucharist that becomes a fast-food operation might be compared to a baptism that proceeds from eye-droppers or aerosol cans.

Vestments are sacred garments rather than costumes or billboards. They are meant to designate certain ministers in their liturgical function by clothing creatures in beauty. Their symbolic strength comes not from their decoration but from their texture, form, and color. The basic vestment of major ministers is the stole, which bishops and presbyters wear around the neck and deacons wear over the left shoulder. No other ministers wear stoles in the Roman Rite. Ministers ordained to lesser orders may wear albs. When laypersons carry out liturgical duties it is more fitting that they wear their own clothes as members of the assembly, which is no mean dignity in itself. Dalmatic, chasuble, cope, and miter can be handsome garments and should be worn as complements to the assembly whose purpose at worship is never merely utilitarian but festive.

Books are means rather than ends. Even so, they should be worthy of the Word they record and of those among whom the Word has taken flesh.

Good images are neither accidents nor fantasies but knowledgeable accomplishments that go beyond what can be observed either now or in time past. As John Meagher says, they are meant to evoke the presence of mysteries the mind has glimpsed, to remind us of the ancestral heritage of worship, to tease us out of mere thought lest we forget that history does not fence in truth, that we may not substitute critical understanding for reverence, that our knowledge is not so complete or accomplished as we often assume, and above all that our memories mix with our longings and our joys to put us in touch with our deepest sense of home.

Churches are not carpeted. While rugs and runners may occasionally enhance liturgical place by adding festal color, carpeting in quantity wearies the eye and muffles sound. Even with a good electronic sound system, which is a rarity, a carpeted church often has all the acoustical vigor of an elevator. The ambiance of a carpeted church, moreover, is too soft for the liturgy, which needs hardness, sonority, and a certain bracing discomfort, much like the Gospel itself. Liturgical ambiance must challenge, for one comes to the liturgy to transact the public business of death and life rather than to be tucked in with fables and featherpuffs. The liturgy challenges what Quentin Crisp calls the general notion of Christianity as a consolatory religion, as something nice that Jesus of Nazareth could say to those who turn to him for comfort.

Furniture is significant and kept to a minimum. Pews, which entered liturgical place only recently, nail the assembly down, proclaiming that the liturgy is not a common action but a preachment perpetuated upon the seated, an ecclesiastical opera done by virtuosi for a paying audience. Pews distance the congregation, disenfranchise the faithful, and rend the assembly. Filling a church with immoveable pews is similar to placing bleachers directly on a basketball court: It not only interferes with movement but changes the event into something entirely different. Pews are never mentioned in Roman rubrics, nor is there any record that being without pews has ever killed Christians in significant numbers.

Banners are decorative images, not ideological broadsides or opportunities for tricky piety. Rather than a festal gesture for the assembly, banners often are a form of disposable ecclesiastical art bearing disposable thoughts which foster disposable piety. Such banners should be disposed of.