Reformed Worship in the Reformation Era

Calvin argued that only practices explicitly taught in Scripture could be used in worship. For this reason, churches influenced by Calvin have been less inclined to restore pre-Reformation practices of worship perceived as unbiblical or “Catholic.”

The Reformed tradition has several roots: Zurich, Basel, Strassburg, and Geneva. In some ways, it preserved more than its share of the penitential strain of late medieval piety. In other respects, however, it moved beyond the forms in which Lutheranism and Anglicanism were content to continue. In time it was largely seduced by the Puritan tradition (in Great Britain) and the frontier tradition (in America).

Ulrich Zwingli (1484–1531) began his reformation of Zurich heavily influenced by humanistic studies and a thorough biblicism. He was anxious to return worship to its biblical roots and eager to make it more spiritual, reflecting the gap he saw between the physical and the spiritual. Although a fine musician, he rejected music in worship as distracting one from spiritual worship. Iconoclasm in Zurich purified or devastated the churches, according to one’s viewpoint. Zwingli retained the four Sundays or festivals when his people were accustomed to receiving communion or the Eucharist, a preaching service being held on the other Sundays. These four occasions saw a drastically simplified rite that focused on the transubstantiation of the people, not the elements.

Martin Bucer in Strassburg and John Oecolampadius (1482–1531) in Basel began experimenting with vernacular services. At Strassburg, this included daily prayer services and a Sunday service derived from the Mass. Bucer’s influence was spread further by a visiting preacher out of a job, John Calvin (1509–1564). While serving temporarily a French-speaking congregation in Strassburg, Calvin adapted the German rite Bucer was using. Calvin brought this rite to Geneva, and from 1542 on it became the model for much of the Reformed tradition. Although deriving its structure from the Mass via Bucer, it had moved to highlight the penitential aspects of worship and was highly didactic and moralistic. Relief from this somber mood was wrought by encouraging the congregation to sing metrical paraphrases of the psalms, which they did with fervor. Such devotion to psalmody (and the exclusion of hymnody) marked Reformed worship for several centuries and still does in some churches.

Calvin’s low esteem for human nature was balanced by a high view of God’s Word and of the sacraments. (Although almost all Protestants considered baptism and the Eucharist as sacraments, Luther was willing to include penance, Calvin possibly ordination, and Zinzendorf marriage.) Calvin’s doctrine of eucharistic feeding on Christ through the operation of the Holy Spirit, although certainly not without problems, was the most sophisticated Reformation eucharistic doctrine but was largely lost by his heirs.

John Knox (c. 1505–1572) transmitted this tradition to Scotland as others brought it to France, the Netherlands, and the Germanic countries. Knox’s liturgy, renamed the Book of Common Order, flourished in Scotland for eighty years after 1564. Only then did the Scots yield to the Puritan effort to achieve national unity in worship through the Westminster Directory of 1645. This moved away from set forms to more permissive patterns, yet the Directory remained vaguely normative in later editions in America. On the American frontier, the newly emerging frontier patterns of worship tended to engulf the Reformed tradition.

A pattern of recovery slowly eventuated in America. Charles W. Baird (1828–1887) led the way in 1855 with a title many thought oxymoronic, Presbyterian Liturgies. German Reformed Christians experienced a recovery of both theology and liturgy in the so-called Mercersburg movement. Eventually, an American service book, the Book of Common Worship, followed in 1906, as did service books in the Kirk of Scotland. In recent years, Presbyterians have followed closely in the same post-Vatican II ecumenical mainstream as other traditions of the right and center, signified by the publication of their Supplemental Liturgical Resources.

Swiss Reformation

In 1519, two years after Luther published his theses, Ulrich Zwingli was made priest of the church at Zurich. He had been born a few weeks after Luther and was educated at Basle, Berne, and Vienna. He had also made many friends among the humanists. He was attracted to a clerical life because of its opportunities for study, and initially he became a parish priest at Glarus. Later his friends secured him the appointment to Zurich. In time he became hostile in his attitude toward the requirements of the Catholic religion. He opposed the ascetic life, saint worship, and the belief in purgatory. He accepted the Bible as the supreme authority in religion, and Christ as a sufficient Savior. He preached these as theological truths, but he was morally lax and did not know religion by personal experience. Illness sobered him, and he became interested in bringing about reforms in the city. By 1523 he was debating before the city council and in public the abolition of images in the churches, and contending that the Lord’s Supper was only a memorial of Jesus. As a consequence, the council abolished images, the mass, and the monasteries. Morals courts were set up to take the place of the church courts in cases of conduct and marriage. Zwingli became the power behind the council. He was different from Luther in his outlook on life, in his religious experience, in his aims, and in his methods. Luther was naturally conservative, hoping to save what he could of the old system unless the Bible discredited it. Zwingli wanted to do away with every practice that the Bible did not specifically mention. Zwingli was also a patriot who was ready to fight for his political principles. Thus the troubles he got into came from the Catholic cantons, which threatened war on Zurich, not the pope who saw Zwingli as a minor player. The Swiss Confederation was segregated into two groups: the states that desired democratic government, moral and ecclesiastical reforms, and the abolition of mercenary customs and those that were aristocratic in politics, loyally Catholic, and inclined to hold on to foreign pensions and military payments. War broke out and Zwingli’s Zurich army was defeated at Kappel in 1531. Zwingli was killed in the battle.

Impact: Zwingli’s mantle of leadership fell to Heinrich Bullinger, a friend of John Calvin and a man whose temperate nature brought various groups together and helped further the Reformation in Switzerland.

Zwingli, Ulrich

Ulrich Zwingli (1484-1531) grew up in an educated and affluent home and, at his father’s bidding, studied in Vienna for the priesthood. In 1506 he was named a parish priest in Glarus where he demonstrated great skills as an orator. When he was named chief pastor of the Great Minster Church in Zurich he began openly expressing his disagreements with the church, especially decrying such practices as the worship of Mary and the sale of indulgences. He did not fully break from Rome until he nearly died during the plague of 1519. After surviving he fully dedicated his life to the cause of spreading a unified Reformation throughout Switzerland, although he came into conflict with local Anabaptists and Lutherans over various doctrinal matters. Despite the successes he enjoined, there were many who still supported Rome. An accord, called the Peace of Kappel, was reached between the Protestants and the Catholics but by 1531 a revolt broke out and Zwingli was killed in battle. His successor was a staunch Calvinist, Johann Heinrich Bullinger, who effectively guided the Swiss church and established the Evangelical Reformed churches. His popularity made him a martyr to the Protestant cause and helped seal the success of the Reformation in Switzerland.