Planning Worship with a Worship Directory

Modern options for worship range from fixed liturgical practice at one end to “free church” liberty at the other. The directory approach, common among Presbyterians, falls in the middle. Modern directories are adaptations of the original directory of the church of Scotland (first published in 1645). In recent years many Presbyterian denominations have adopted new directories with the intent of using them to reform and renew worship. A directory not only guides worship, but also is useful as a teaching tool for pastors, leaders, and members.

A Directory for Worship combines law with liturgical theology and gives practical guidance for planning and leading worship. The Presbyterian tradition’s official texts deal with doctrine (the set of catechisms and confessions), government (the Form of Government and Rules of Discipline), and liturgy (the Directory for Worship). Such documents are the constitution of a Presbyterian denomination. The liturgical standard or Directory is found in the Book of Order, with the governmental and disciplinary parts of the constitution. A Directory is a strategy for ordering worship in a tradition that seeks to be evangelical, catholic, and Reformed.

Three Approaches

A directory approach may be contrasted conveniently with three other classic strategies for ordering worship. To the right of the spectrum is the prescribed liturgy such as the Roman Sacramentary, the Episcopal Book of Common Prayer, and the Lutheran books of worship. To the left is the Free Church tradition, which historically insists upon the local liberty to be governed by the Bible alone in ordering worship. The middle ground is represented by the Reformed churches, which have books for discretionary use by the pastor. A directory, such as that used among Presbyterians, is a fourth strategy, closely related to a discretionary liturgy. In fact, contemporary worship renewal displays more a continuum than a set of discrete alternatives among these strategies: Their characteristic features are blending together in the last quarter of the twentieth century.

American and Irish Presbyterians have repeatedly revised and rewritten their directories. The Church of Scotland, on the other hand, has never reworked the original directory (The Directory for the Public Worship of God or Westminster Directory of 1645). While other national traditions have also adopted the directory approach, the Presbyterians of the United States have maintained the model most consistently as their constitutional provision for worship.

Directory Contents. All directories for worship have dealt with these topics: the principles of worship, parts of the Sunday service, the sacraments of baptism and the Lord’s Supper, pastoral ceremonies and ministries (weddings, burials, and visiting the sick), daily (family) worship, and special times of worship (fasting and thanksgiving). American Presbyterian directories have added topics such as offerings (systematic giving), Sunday school (or “catechism”), and the prayer meeting (or “social worship”). The aim of the directory as a strategy has been to guide worship by the Word of God in Scripture, balancing liberty and liturgical tradition.

History of Directories. The notion of an abbreviated summary or outline of liturgical practices has a long history. The church orders of the ancient church (third to the sixth century) described the practice of worshiping communities with varying detail. Many sixteenth and seventeenth-century Puritans tackled the definition of essentials for evangelical church life and order. By the time of the Westminster Assembly in England (1640-49), various “directories” (such as that of Thomas Cartwright, 1574-90, reprinted 1644) expressed what the different parties favored in reforming church order.

Scotland. The first generations of the reformed Church of Scotland, as well as the Reformed churches on the continent, adopted liturgical documents derived from the ministry of Calvin and other reformers. John Knox represents this extension into Scotland of the worship of the continental Reformed churches with the Book of Common Order (or “Psalm-Book”), which was printed continuously for Scotland from 1564 until 1644. But by the seventeenth century, English Puritanism and similar forces in the Church of Scotland demanded further reform in liturgy and polity.

The Westminster Directory. The Directory of Worship derived from the efforts of Puritans in England, and Scottish Presbyterians, to reform the British church at the Westminster Assembly of the 1640s. Westminster thus supplied Scotland with the first Directory for Worship, along with the doctrines (the Westminster Confession of Faith and Catechisms) characteristic of later Presbyterianism.

The Westminster divines sought a basic uniformity in doctrine, favored plainness of ceremony, and insisted on the freedom to obey Scripture and the Holy Spirit in worship. Disputes over liturgical customs necessitated measures of compromise between the Scots and the vocal minority of Independent Puritans. The Directory for the Public Worship of God proved both too radical for Puritans willing to tolerate a prayer book, and too restrictive for Separatists and many Independent Puritans. Though briefly enacted, the Assembly’s Directory for Worship was virtually ignored in England.

Only the Church of Scotland replaced its liturgical book (the discretionary liturgy from Knox’s book) with the new Directory. It became the distinctly Presbyterian liturgical strategy, adopted by the General Assembly along with the second document of 1647 known as the Directory for Family Worship. The ideal of liturgical unity in an English-speaking Reformed church resulted ironically in another new approach to liturgical order, alongside Free church liberty and the Anglican prayer book.

The Westminster Directory provided the order for the Sunday service and guidance for every part (“ordinance”) of worship. An outline or schedule was given for each of the prayers. At least a full chapter from both the Old and New Testaments was to be read in every service. An eloquent treatise on the “plain style” preaching typical of Puritans and Scots provided edification for the pastors. Both baptism and the Lord’s Supper were outlined with the ceremony, exhortations, and prayers in detail just short of a full wording.

The Directory demanded spiritual discipline and skill for the ministry of leading worship. The Bible was to be expounded through a continuous reading in public worship and was to be read systematically in family worship. The prayers were comprehensively outlined to guide the pastor through confession and petition for grace, intercessions, and thanksgiving. Considerable attention was given to marriage and visiting the sick, with an eye to civil law and pastoral theology. Other matters addressed included the Lord’s Day, fast days and days of thanksgiving, burial (a civil event), and a brief mention of the singing of psalms. The Directory for Family Worship dealt with the daily worship of the church in its households.

The first Directory was a failure, both as a tool for guiding worship and as a means to reconcile different liturgical customs. The ideal of evangelical rigor in the worship of a comprehensively national church proved to be too demanding for the context in which it appeared. But it provided a precedent for later Presbyterians to pursue the same goals: guidance for worship that is broad enough to include diversity and hold a changing communion together while excluding unacceptable deviations and providing specific helps for prayer and worship. The Presbyterian Directory bore fruit in later generations of liturgical renewal from the mid-nineteenth century through present efforts to revise resources and develop skills for worship.

Current Directories

The directory strategy currently is flourishing among American Presbyterians, as separate denominations shape their liturgical and doctrinal idiom. The largest denomination, the Presbyterian Church (USA), adopted a complex new directory in 1989 while it was also publishing a series of supplemental liturgical resources (1984-91). This latest directory was significantly influenced by the revisions of liturgical forms and books for voluntary use in worship. A new service book (projected for 1993) will share a partnership with the Directory in guiding worship. A similar relationship now exists in the Reformed Church in America (Worship the Lord, 1987). A service book for the Presbyterian Church (USA) will not have the constitutional authority of the Directory, but this option now clearly includes discretionary liturgical book(s) for the use of those who plan and lead worship.

The Presbyterian Church (USA) Directory for Worship (1989) gives constitutional requirements for worship, but its role is shifting to primarily a teaching document. The change began in the 1960s, as a century of liturgical recovery and creativity once again inspired directories designed to guide reform of worship. This latest directory speaks more in permission and suggestion than as law or regulation; it is also by far the longest, most complex directory ever adopted.

Other Presbyterian denominations are revising and adopting new directories. The Cumberland and the Second Cumberland Presbyterian Church adopted in common a new directory in 1984. The Presbyterian Church in America reclaimed the nineteenth-century tradition in its new directory of 1975. The Evangelical Presbyterian Church adopted in 1981 a directory based on the directories from the 1960s. In 1975, the directory of the Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church reduced its scope essentially to the sacraments and acknowledged that many resources will be employed for assisting public worship. Both the Reformed Presbyterian and Orthodox Presbyterian Church are refining their directories from the 1940s to conform with their confessional priorities. An unofficial but general experiment seems in progress among American Presbyterians to discover how best to guide worship. Both the fracturing of the tradition and fresh ferment within it can be seen in the state of directories for worship in the United States.

Advantages and Disadvantages

The advantages and disadvantages of a directory approach tend to be the same features. Considerable authority is given to, and skill expected from, those who plan and lead worship. Principles and guidance must be translated into words, actions, and ceremonies. A directory can communicate the essentials of worship and define a denomination’s liturgical tradition, while still encouraging local creativity. A directory (in contrast to a prescribed liturgy) may risk allowing poor liturgical discipline because it requires self-discipline on the part of both leaders and worshipers. A directory can be a mirror of unity in the midst of diversity and also a tool for liturgical training.

The current generation of Presbyterian directories all tackle the educational task to a greater extent than previously. More of a background in theology of worship is given, as well as more practical guidance. These directories also assume the use of other resources in the manner of the Presbyterian Church (USA) service book, the official Reformed Church in America liturgy, or the relatively new tendency to borrow liturgical forms and texts of other denominations. The blending of strategies is taking place as one result of ecumenical sharing in scholarship and resources.

A directory approach expresses the truth of Christian worship that liturgy must be appropriated individually and adapted to the local community. Many churches involved in liturgical renewal are struggling to move beyond the stage of preparation of new books to this deeper level. A directory for worship can be a teaching tool for ministers, leaders, and members. It can also affirm the nature of true liturgical unity within the variety of styles and missional requirements created by evangelization and change in denominations. A directory for worship is helpful when both training and resources are available, and pastors are committed to the ministry of leading and teaching worship. The directory strategy for ordering worship holds up the ideal of a comprehensive catholicity, combined with an evangelical fervor and Reformed obedience to the Word of God.

A Post-Reformation Model of Worship: The Westminster Directory

In 1643, following the outbreak of civil war in England between the Puritan-controlled Parliament and the Anglican King Charles I, Parliament commissioned 150 ministers and lay leaders to draft a new confession, catechism, worship service, and form of government for England. Although this body, later known as the Westminster Assembly of Divines, was predominantly Presbyterian, almost a dozen Congregationalists were invited. This body produced the first Westminster Directory.

Introduction

The Westminster Assembly first began work on replacing the Anglican Book of Common Prayer in the belief that both Presbyterians and Congregationalists shared compatible views of worship. One Congregationalist was elected to the nine-member subcommittee on liturgical matters.

As late as the end of the nineteenth century, the Congregational historian Williston Walker could say that this order of worship “is substantially the one that has been used in conservative Presbyterian and Congregational churches for generations.” The word “substantially,” however, is significant. The Congregationalists did take exception to certain parts of the Directory. Plus, a number of compromises within the Directory itself reflect division in the Assembly. Furthermore, some descriptions of New England church services from decades after its adoption bear a much closer resemblance to the service described by John Cotton than to the Directory. In general, Congregationalists eventually came to follow the form of the Directory with some modifications.

In the actual Directory text, each item is accompanied by an extended explanation, similar to Cotton’s. Notes are appended in this explanation only when necessary for clarity or when Congregational practice differed from that of Presbyterians.

Text:

Call to Worship (Prefacing)

Commentary: The Congregationalists argued that “all prefacing was unlawful; that according to 1 Timothy 2:1, it was necessary to begin with prayer, and that in the first prayer we behooved to pray for the King.” See “Prayer before the Sermon” below.

Text:

Prayer of Approach
Psalm Reading
Old Testament Chapter
New Testament Chapter

Commentary: Ordinarily, entire chapters of books were read. Some Congregationalists sang a psalm between one or more of the readings to aid in concentration. The Directory notes that if comment (Cotton’s “expounding”) is to be made on the Scripture, it is to be done after a chapter is read, not while it is read.

Text:

Psalm (sung)
Prayer Before the Sermon

Commentary: In most Reformed liturgies, this item indicates a simple prayer for the delivery of the sermon. In a compromise with the Congregationalists, the type of prayers specified in 1 Timothy 2:1 are listed here so they can be prayed fairly early in the service if not at the very beginning. The Directory also specified that some petitions could be deferred until after the sermon, which allowed for the Presbyterian preference for having the primary prayer after the sermon.

Text:

Sermon
General Prayer

Commentary: The General Prayer was the prayer and thanksgiving for all things not coming under the headings of Prayer of Approach or Prayer Before the Sermon. When the petitions of the Prayer Before the Sermon were deferred, the General Prayer was termed the Long Prayer and was so described until well into the twentieth century.

Text:

Lord’s Prayer

Commentary: Many Congregationalists protested that the Lord’s Prayer was a model for prayer rather than a specific set prayer. The Anglican liturgy prescribed multiple uses of the Lord’s Prayer and was condemned by the Congregationalists as requiring “vain repetitions” contrary to the Word of God. The Directory declared that it was not a mere model and “recommended” its use.

Text:

Psalm (sung)
Blessing

Order of the Lord’s Supper

Commentary: The celebration of the Lord’s Supper was “judged to be convenient” following the morning sermon. The frequency of administration was left up to each church; but a preparatory sermon or midweek lecture was to be made if administration was not weekly.

Text:

Exhortation

Commentary: A brief explanation of the benefit of the sacrament.

Text:

Warning

Commentary: Fencing of the table by warning unrepentant sinners not to participate.

Text:

Invitation

Commentary: Encouragement of those who “labor under the sense of burden of their sins” to participate.

Text:

Words of Institution: 1 Corinthians 11:23–27, followed by optional explanation.

Commentary: From the Gospels or 1 Corinthians 11:23–27.

Text:

Prayer, Thanksgiving, or Blessing of the Bread and Wine

Commentary: Note the single blessing to which the Congregationalists objected.

Text:

Fraction and Delivery: “According to the holy institution, command, and example of our blessed Savior Jesus Christ, I take this bread, and, having given thanks, I break it, and give it unto you. [Delivery to the communicants] Take ye, eat ye; this is the body of Christ which is broken for you: do this in remembrance of Him.… According to the institution, command, and example of our Lord Jesus Christ, I take this cup, and give it unto you; [Delivery to the communicants] This cup is the New Testament in the blood of Christ, which is shed for the remission of the sins of many: drink ye all of it.”

Commentary: Presbyterian practice was to have the communicants sit at a central table. Congregationalists regarded this as unnecessary and sat in their pews. The Directory allows either option.

Text:

Exhortation
Solemn Thanksgiving
Collect for the Poor: “The collection for the poor is so to be ordered, that no part of the public worship be thereby hindered.”

Rise of Protestant denominations

By the opening of the twentieth century, Protestantism was represented by many denominations, both large and small. Most had broken off one of the major groups, which included the Anglicans, the Baptists, the Congregationalists, the Methodists, the Presbyterians, and the Lutherans.

Impact: As time went by sectarian differences became less important and denominations cooperated for such causes as evangelism, social action, and missionary activities.

Rise of denominational seminaries

In America, the first colleges were intended primarily for theological students. By the nineteenth century, however, it was becoming clear that special schools should be provided for ministerial candidates. Soon various denominations had standardized the theological curriculum in a three-year course of post-college seminary instruction. The programs were based chiefly on the literature of the Bible, systematic theology and apologetics, practical courses in homiletics and pastoral methods, lectures on church history, and the art of public speaking. Certain denominations like the Presbyterians were insistent on an educated ministry; others like the Methodists did not make such demands generally, only among those who ministered to large, prominent congregations. With the broadening of general culture and the introduction of new subjects into the college curriculum, the theological schools were compelled to improve their facilities. Instead of taking ministers from the pulpit to fill chairs of instruction, schools turned more and more to the trained experts. Professors introduced new courses into the curriculum, including the social sciences, philosophy, and religious literature. A few students who wished to specialize went to England or Germany to acquaint themselves first hand with European scholarship. In addition, with the increase of evangelism and the multiplication of opportunities for service in the churches, there was a growing demand for religious workers other than ministers in both the home churches and in mission countries. To meet these demands training schools were founded, like Moody Bible Institute in Chicago, which gave a less thorough preparation, but which provided students with something of the technique of religious work.

Impact: From seminaries and Bible schools went thousands of young men and women eager for Christian work, ministering and serving wherever the opportunities opened.

Revival along the Appalachian frontier

Frontier religion in the late eighteenth century was marked by its emotionalism. This was due in part to a love of adventure among those who ventured beyond the relative safety of New England. When people moved farther away into the open country, new churches were seldom feasible at first. If they were to be given any religion it was through the willingness of ministers to travel endlessly, or through an organization that would supply religious instruction. Both methods were tried. Baptist pastors at times left their churches for a preaching tour. Others gave most of their time to an unattached mission as evangelists. Associations of churches appointed their agents to go into the South or to the western frontier of New York and Canada. Both Massachusetts and Connecticut Congregationalists organized voluntary missionary societies near the end of the eighteenth century. In 1801 a Plan of Union was arranged between Congregationalists and Presbyterians for missionary undertakings in the new West. Volunteer societies worked best because they were composed of only those persons who were interested in and would contribute to the expenses. Missionaries sent out by such societies were paid meager salaries as contributions were small, but they worked faithfully in the midst of loneliness, fatigue, and numerous hardships. Outdoor gatherings, similar to those of Whitefield, attracted crowds of people.

Impact: The opportunity for social gatherings had a powerful appeal to people who were starving for companionship. They were stirred by the evangelistic drive of the preachers, who encouraged emotional expression. The same exhibitions of tearful remorse and exuberant joy that appeared in England under Wesley’s preaching and in the Great Awakening in America appeared on the frontier. Out of the conversions of the camp meetings, the churches gathered recruits and the morals of the region showed dramatic improvement.