Names of God the Father in the Bible

Biblical worshipers reverenced the name of the Lord, but the terminology they used varied depending on the worshipers’ needs, preference, or customary usage within the community. Included here are some of the major names or titles applied to God the Father in worship.

God (’El)

’El was the original supreme god of the Semitic pantheon; the title is associated with the idea of strength or might. By the time the Israelite tribes settled in Canaan, the principal god was Ba’al (“husband” or “lord”), the divinity of popular worship, especially fertility rites. ’El had receded into the background, and his name had become a generic term for “god.” Hence the name ’El could be applied to Yahweh, usually in combination with a qualifier. The following are the major compound names with ’El found in the Scripture.

Almighty God (’El shaddai). Shaddai is sometimes used alone. It comes from a Hebrew word meaning “mountain” and carries the meaning of “mountain God,” as well as the sense of strength and majesty. The thought, though not the name, is suggested in Psalm 121:1. As a title for God, ’El shaddai is largely associated with the patriarchal period; it is used often in the book of Job, which is set in that period, and it is as ’El shaddai that God changes the names of both Abram (Gen. 17:5) and Jacob (Gen. 35:10–12), in reaffirming his promise of land and descendants.

God Most High (’El ‘elyon). The root is probably ‘alah which means “to go up.” The name seems to have been associated with Salem (Gen. 14:18–20), a pre-Israelite designation for Jerusalem, where the Israelite sanctuary would eventually be located, and quite possibly came into use in Israel through Jebusites who converted to the worship of Yahweh. In the Psalms, the name is usually associated with Zion, either as ’El ‘elyon or simply ‘Elyon (Pss. 46:4, 50:14; 91:1; 92:1).

Mighty God (’El gibbor). The term gibbor, which describes a military man or warrior (1 Chron. 27:6), is frequently applied to God (Isa. 9:6; 10:21; Hab. 1:12). Psalm 24:8 celebrates “The Lord strong and mighty, the Lord mighty in battle.”

Eternal God (’El ‘olam). In Beersheba, Abraham called on the name of Yahweh, the everlasting or “Eternal God” (Gen. 21:33). The word ‘olam refers to continuous existence or long duration, both past and future. Eternity is ascribed to God as the sustainer of the creation, and more significantly, as the guarantor of the stability and enduring quality of the covenant with his people; the expression “everlasting covenant” occurs a number of times in Scripture (bƒrit ‘olam, Gen. 9:16; Isa. 61:8; Jer. 50:5; Ezek. 37:26; Ps. 105:10; diathēkē aiōniou, Heb. 13:20). The “Song of Moses” (Deut. 32:40) presents a picture of the Lord taking a covenant oath, lifting his hand and swearing, “as I live forever [lƒ‘olam].” The phrase “eternal God” occurs also in Isaiah 40:28, using another Hebrew word for God (’Elohei ‘olam).

The Living God (’El ḥai, Theos zontos). The expression “living God” describes Yahweh as a God of energy, vitality, and wrath. The name is associated with the ark (Josh. 3:10) and, in the longer form ’Elohim ḥayyim, with the armies of Israel (1 Sam. 17:26, 36). The psalmists cry out for the presence of the living God in the sanctuary (’El ḥai, Pss. 42:2; 84:2). Moses refers to the living God speaking from the midst of the fire in the Sinai covenant, and Jeremiah speaks of the wrath of Yahweh, “the living God, the eternal King” (Jer. 10:10). These expressions (both ’Elohim ḥayyim) form the background for the warning of the author of Hebrews, “It is a dreadful thing to fall into the hands of the living God” (Theos zontos, Heb. 10:31; cf. Rev. 7:2). Peter confessed Jesus as the Christ, “Son of the living God” (Matt. 16:16). Perhaps in allusion to the presence of the living God with the hosts of Israel, the New Testament church is called “the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of the truth” (1 Tim. 3:15) and “Mount Zion … the city of the living God” (Heb. 12:22).

The Mighty One, God Yahweh (‘El ‘Elohim Yahveh). This expression occurs in Psalm 50:1; similar expressions are “great and mighty God” (’El haggadol haggibbor, Jer. 32:18) and “the God great and mighty and awesome” (Ha’El haggadol haggibbor vƒhannora’, Deut. 10:17; Neh. 9:32). These phrases are examples of the tendency of Semitic worshipers to pile up expressions in an attempt to convey the overpowering majesty of the Lord. The word awesome in Hebrew is nora’, literally, “to be feared.” It communicates the worshiper’s response of trembling or awe in the presence of the might and mystery of the Holy One; it is derived from the root y-r-’, the base for Hebrew words having to do with reverence and respect for God. Hebrew has no word for religion but conveys the idea through expressions such as “the fear of Yahweh” (Prov. 1:7; 9:10).

Deity (’Elohim)

Far more common than ’El, as applied to Yahweh, is the term ’Elohim, the plural of ’Eloah, “god.” The singular form is not found in the Hebrew Scriptures. In the New Testament, Theos translates both ’El and ’Elohim as a general term for God; usually it is preceded by the definite article, literally “the God.”

God. ’Elohim is the common Hebrew title for any divinity; since, for Israel, Yahweh is the only relevant divinity, he is called ’Elohim by his people, frequently with no qualifiers. In Scripture, the word ’Elohim can refer to pagan gods (Josh. 24:2; Ps. 96:4–5), to angelic beings (Ps. 8:5), or even to prominent or powerful people such as judges or princes (Ps. 82:6). As applied to Yahveh, the plural ’Elohim always takes a singular verb or modifier. Use of the plural conveys the idea of importance or majesty, a common practice in Semitic languages. It does not have implications for the doctrine of the Trinity, as is sometimes suggested. In a group of the Psalms found in Books II and III, ’Elohim appears to have been substituted by scribes for an original Yahveh; scholars occasionally refer to this part of the Psalms as the “Elohistic Psalter.”

God of Jacob (’Elohei Ya‘‡qov); God of Israel (’Elohei Yisra’el). Since Jacob and Israel are the same, these titles are equivalent. (Examples of the first are Isa. 2:3; Pss. 46:7; 81:1, 4; the second, which is more common, occurs in Exod. 24:10; Josh. 22:24; Isa. 45:3; Ruth 2:12; 1 Chron. 4:10; Theos Israēl, Matt. 15:31). Yahweh is the God who belongs specifically to Jacob, or Israel, by virtue of the covenant established at Mount Sinai. In pagan thought, gods ruled specific localities; thus Israel, when in Egypt, could have been expected to transfer its allegiance from the God who had met Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in Canaan, to the gods of Goshen, where they were residing. At Sinai, however, they entered into covenant with one particular God whose name was Yahweh, in this case using the Hebrew construct form ’Elohei or “God of” Jacob.

Lord (’Adon); My Lordship (’Adonai)

’Adonai is the plural form with the pronominal suffix. These are covenant titles for Yahweh; the plural form denotes majesty or increased status. Under ancient treaty structure the great king who entered into covenant with a lesser monarch was known as the “lord,” while his vassal was the “servant.” Because Israel, unlike the pagan nations around it, had entered into covenant with its God, they knew Yahweh as “the Lord” and regarded themselves as his servants (2 Chron. 6:22–23).

Jewish worshipers used ’adon and ‡donai as substitutes for the divine name Yahveh. The Hebrew alphabet does not have vowels, but in the early Christian centuries Jewish scholars known as Masoretes devised a system of vocalization, or “points,” to show the vowel pronunciations in the biblical text. Devout Jews considered the name Yahveh too sacred to be pronounced, so when reading the Scriptures in worship they substituted the word Lord. In the text, scribes inserted the vowel points for ’Adonai into the name Yahveh (written YHWH) as a reminder to the reader to use ’Adonai instead. Translators of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries did not understand this practice and sometimes combined the vowel sounds for ’Adonai with the consonants for Yahveh, creating the name “Jehovah,” which was unknown in ancient times. English versions usually substitute the term the Lord where the name Yahveh occurs in the Hebrew, often using capital letters to indicate the substitution (the Lord).

Yahweh (the Lord)

Yahveh (usually Yahweh in English texts) is the personal or covenant name of God. By this name the Lord introduced himself to Moses at the burning bush (Exod. 3:13–15). The biblical text relates it to the Hebrew verb “to be,” and translates it “I am.” Taken literally, the Lord’s statement to Moses was, ’ehyeh ’‡sher ’ehyeh, or “I will be who I will be.” The name Yahveh seems to express his dynamic character, as the God who is revealed through events in history. He identifies himself in terms of the patriarchs who worshiped him, “the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob” (Exod. 3:15). Although the narrative suggests that Yahweh was unknown to Israel at the time he first appeared to Moses, the name was not a new one; the Bible relates that people began to call on the name of Yahweh in the time of Enosh, a grandson of Adam (Gen. 4:26). The original form of the name may have been Yah, which appears by itself several times in the Old Testament (Ps. 68:4) and as the ending of the exclamation Hallelujah! (praise Yah!). Another form may have been Yahu, as in the Hebrew forms of many names such as Isaiah (Yƒsha‘yahu, “salvation of Yahu”), Jeremiah, Adonijah, Hilkiah, Hezekiah, Benaiah, and so on.

In Christian worship, the name of the Lord is sometimes combined with other terms that qualify his relationship to the worshiper. In the Bible, however, many of these are not actually names of Yahweh. They are often names given to places where he manifests himself in a special way to his people. The following is a discussion of the best-known phrases that belong in this category. (Because of its importance, the expression “Lord of hosts” is treated separately.)

The Lord Our Provider (Yahveh yir’eh). This expression, familiar in English as “Jehovah Jireh,” literally means “Yahweh will see,” in the sense of provide (just as we say, “I’ll see to it”). Abraham gave this name to the place where the Lord provided a ram as the substitute for the sacrifice of Isaac (Gen. 22:14).

The Lord My Banner (Yahveh nissi). The banner, nes, was actually a standard or ensign used to rally an army in battle. After Israel’s victory over the Amalekites, Moses built an altar and gave it this name (Exod. 17:15).

The Lord Your Healer (Yahveh rof’ekha). Following the Exodus from Egypt, the Israelites came to a place where the water was undrinkable. After providing sweet water for them, the Lord promised that if the people would obey him he would protect them from the diseases of Egypt as their healer (Exod. 15:26).

The Lord Our Righteousness (Yahveh tzidqenu). The prophet Jeremiah used this as a title, not for Yahweh, but for the ideal Davidic king who is to reign with justice (Jer. 23:6). In the New Testament the word righteousness (dikaiosunē) is applied to Jesus Christ, who fulfills this expectation (1 Cor. 1:30; cf. 2 Pet. 1:1; 1 John 2:1).

The Lord Is Peace (Yahveh shalom). Gideon gave this name to an altar he built after the messenger of the Lord had appeared to him and called him to lead the Israelites against their Midianite oppressors. Because Gideon had seen a manifestation of God, he was afraid he would be struck dead (Judg. 6:11–24). But the messenger reassured him, saying, “Peace! Do not be afraid” (v. 23). From the context, it is obvious that the Lord’s “peace” (shalom) is not the absence of war; Gideon was being summoned to begin a war. Rather, in the context of life under the condition of sin and conflict, “peace” in the Bible means wholeness, health, salvation, prosperity, blessing, success. The prophetic hope for the ultimate perfection of all things, however, envisions a peace that includes the cessation of war, conflict, and fear (Mic. 4:3; Isa. 2:4).

The Lord Is There (Yahveh shammah). Ezekiel, prophesying during the exile in Babylon, specified this name for the city where the sanctuary was to be restored (Ezek. 48:35). It is a wordplay on the name of Jerusalem in Hebrew (Yƒrushalayim). Strictly speaking, it is not a name for the Lord. However, Christians understand that the Lord God himself is the temple in the new Jerusalem, the worshiping church (Rev. 21:22), and in that sense it is a name for God.

Lord of Hosts

We may derive the meanings of the names of God from the ways Israel used them in worship. Yahveh, as his covenant name, is associated with the ark of the covenant and often appears in combination with the term tzƒva’ot, “armies,” as in “Lord of hosts” (Yahveh tzƒva’ot, 2 Sam. 7:26; Pss. 24:10; 84:1; Isa. 9:7), or “Lord of hosts” (’Adonai Yahveh tzƒva’ot, Jer. 32:18 nasb). (Host is an old English word meaning “army.”) These expressions are the battle names of the Lord; as Israel’s covenant Lord or King, Yahweh, symbolized by the ark, which was his throne and the place of his presence, led the nation into war (1 Sam. 4:1–11). The cry preserved in Numbers 10:35–36 and Psalm 132:8, “Arise, O Lord, and come to your resting place, you and the ark of your might,” expressed this idea. The concept appears also in Psalm 24:7–10 when the Lord enters the gates of the sanctuary, probably reflecting a procession led by the ark, and in Psalm 10:12, when the psalmist asks the Lord to avenge his people. The title “Lord of hosts” appears also in the New Testament, the Hebrew word for hosts being taken over in transliteration (Kurios sabaoth, Rom. 9:29; James 5:4).

Other Names for God

In addition to the proper name Yahveh and the titles “God,” “Deity,” and “Lord,” the Bible contains many other important names by which Yahweh’s people know him.

Holy One (Qadosh); Holy One of Israel (Qƒdosh Yisra’el). Yahweh is called “the Holy One” (Isa. 40:25; Hos. 11:9) or sometimes “the Holy One of Israel” (2 Kings 19:22; Ps. 89:18; Isa. 37:23) or ’Elohai Qƒdoshi, “my God, my Holy One” (Hab. 1:12). The root meaning of holiness is separation or being set apart; therefore the phrase “the Holy One of Israel” means “the God who is distinctively Israel’s.” By the same token, Israel is a people “holy to the Lord their God” (Deut. 7:6; 14:2, 21; 26:19; 28:9), set apart for him. The basic meaning of holiness, therefore, is not goodness, purity, or moral virtue, but the transcendent quality of being above and separated from the common or ordinary. The English words sacred and sacrosanct better convey the meaning. In worship, the concept of God as the Holy One is evident in such instances as the cry of the seraphim in Isaiah’s temple vision: qadosh qadosh qadosh ’Adonai Yahveh tzƒva’ot, “Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of hosts” (Isa. 6:3 nasb).

Mighty One of Israel (’Avir Yisra’el). An example of this usage is Isaiah 1:24. A variant is “Mighty One of Jacob” (’Avir Ya‘‡qov, Isa. 49:26; 60:16; Ps. 132:2, 5). This is similar to ’Elohei Ya‘‡qov, with added stress on the superior power of Yahweh, who belonged to Jacob, or the nation of Israel.

King (Melekh). As the giver of the covenant, Yahweh stands in the position of King over his vassal subjects, the Creator of his people (Isa. 43:15). Although Israel and Judah had earthly kings, they could not rule with the same absolute authority enjoyed by kings of the surrounding peoples, because the ultimate kingship of the Israelite tribes was vested in the Lord. Kings in the ancient world were military leaders, and the ark of the covenant was the symbol of Yahweh’s role as king in battle, the Lord of the hosts or armies of Israel (Isa. 6:5; Jer. 46:18; Mal. 1:14), the King in the midst of his people to defend them (Zeph. 3:15). As Lord of hosts, Yahweh is the “King of glory,” who enters his sanctuary (Ps. 24:7–10) “enthroned upon the praises of Israel” (Ps. 22:3 nasb). The Psalms summon the people of God to rejoice with abandon before their King (Ps. 149:1–4), who is the great King or Lord of the covenant (Pss. 47:2; 95:3; Mal. 1:14; Matt. 5:35). The worship of the Lord in Zion is a celebration of his kingship, not only over Israel, but over the whole earth or land (Pss. 29; 47; 93; 95–99). Thus, even when Judah faced defeat and exile, God’s true worshipers could praise him as King over all nations (Jer. 10:10), and even Nebuchadnezzar, the ruler of Babylon, is said to have honored him as King of heaven (Dan. 4:37).

In the New Testament, God is rarely called King (Basileus, 1 Tim. 1:17; Rev. 15:3), perhaps because the many Caesars and client kings of the Roman world rendered the title ambiguous for Christian usage. However, the concept of God’s kingship underlies all that is involved in the other titles by which the church knew and worshiped him and is synonymous with the idea of the kingdom of God. The festive celebration of God’s kingship is being increasingly recovered in many parts of today’s church.

Judge (Shofet). The function of a “judge” in ancient Israel was not that of administering justice in the modern legal sense. Justice (mishpat) actually means the entire way of life that maintains the integrity of the covenant and binds the community together; another translation is “custom,” referring to the conventional pattern of behavior that allows a society to function. The Lord is the maintainer and guardian of the covenant he has granted: “God himself is judge” (Ps. 50:6). As King, Yahweh is the Judge, or special guardian, of the weakest members of the covenant community, the orphaned and the oppressed (Pss. 10:18; 82:1–4). Thus, the worshiper who believes his position within the covenant has been compromised by the actions of others often cries out for the Lord to “judge” or vindicate him (Pss. 26:1; 43:1; 54:1). As Creator, Yahweh is also “the Judge of all the earth” (Gen. 18:25), the “judge of all men” (Heb. 12:23), deciding between peoples and nations (Judg. 11:27; Ps. 96:13). The Davidic king judges his people as God’s vice-regent (Ps. 72:1–2), and thus the apostles proclaim Christ as the Judge of all people (Acts 10:42; 17:31) and the vindicator of his own (2 Tim. 4:8; Rev. 6:9–10).

Savior (Moshi‡‘). This title occurs in Psalm 106:21 and often in Isaiah (Isa. 43:3, 11; 45:15; 49:26). In biblical usage, a savior was a national leader who delivered his people from their enemies by victory on the battlefield. In covenant terminology, “savior” is another title for the great king who fights the battles of his vassal. Yahweh was the King who protected Israel and won its military victories. His basic and most important act of deliverance, however, was the great emancipation of Israel from slavery to Pharaoh in Egypt. Because the death and resurrection of Christ effected a new exodus, calling forth a renewed covenant community, the title “Savior” is ascribed also to Jesus in the New Testament.

Redeemer (Go’el). This title is derived from the Hebrew root ga’al, literally “act as kinsman, do the part of the next of kin.” Examples of its use are Isaiah 49:26 and Psalm 103:4. The go’el was the kinsman designated to protect the integrity of the family. It was he who took in a relative’s widow, pursued the slayer of a family member to avenge his death, and bought back land or property that had been alienated from the family. In the Old Testament Yahweh is the Redeemer of Israel from Egyptian bondage (Exod. 15:3), from exile (Isa. 43:1, 14; 44:22–23), from enemies (Isa. 41:14), and from the pit (Ps. 103:4). In the New Testament the title “Redeemer” is not used. However, Paul says that Christ has redeemed, or bought back (exagorazō, Gal. 3:13; 4:5) his people, and speaks of the redemption (apolutrōsis, Rom. 3:24) that is in Christ, a concept that applies to the purchase of freedom for a slave.

Father (’Av, Patēr, Abba). God is called “Father” in the Old Testament (’Av, Jer. 31:9; 1 Chron. 29:10; Mal. 1:6), but far more often in the New Testament, in which the title is frequently on the lips of Jesus (Patēr, Matt. 6:9; John 4:23; 5:17–18; 17:1) and in the preaching and writings of the apostles (Acts 2:33; Eph. 1:2; Phil. 2:11). Jesus often spoke of “my Father,” introducing a note of intimacy and intensity in the relationship between the Father and the Son. This intimacy was so characteristic of the kingdom of God, which Jesus proclaimed, that the Greek Gospels preserve the familiar Aramaic word Abba, which Jesus used (Mark 14:36), and Paul took it up even in a Greek-speaking church (Rom. 8:15; Gal. 4:6). Abba is always paired with its Greek equivalent, Patēr; the double usage does not simply translate the term, but intensifies it. Abba, Patēr probably became a liturgical expression quite early, since it has covenant connotations. Ancient treaties sometimes refer to the great king who grants the covenant as “Father.” When Jesus and the New Testament writers use the phrase “Abba, Father” they recognize not only a familial relationship between God and the church, but a covenant relationship as well.

Husband (Ba‘al, ’Ish, Anēr). The Hebrew word ba‘al means “lord, owner, husband”; ’ish means “man, husband.” As a title for Yahweh, ba‘al is found in Israelite names from the period of the judges and the early kingdom (Jerubbaal, Judg. 7:1; Eshbaal, 1 Chron. 8:33; Meribaal, 1 Chron. 8:34). Because the title Ba‘al was also associated with the prominent Canaanite fertility god, whose cult attracted many Israelites away from the undivided worship of Yahweh, Israelite worshipers abandoned its use for Yahweh in favor of ’ish (Hos. 2:16). Biblical scribes sometimes substituted the word bosheth, “shame, shameful thing,” in proper names that used ba‘al (as in Mephibosheth for Meribaal). However, the Israelite prophets often compare the covenant between Yahweh and Israel to a marriage, especially in the portrayal of Israel and Judah as unfaithful wives (Hos. 2:1–13; Ezek. 23); in this sense Jeremiah applies the verbal form ba‘al, “be a husband,” to Yahweh (Jer. 31:32). In the New Testament, Paul uses the term husband (anēr) figuratively of Christ (2 Cor. 11:2), and the image of the church as the bride of Christ (Eph. 5:22–30; Rev. 21:2, 9) presupposes the concept.

Rock (Tzur). This word is sometimes translated “strength,” “might,” or “mighty,” and refers to the power of the Lord to protect his people; examples are 2 Samuel 22:47; Psalm 18:46; and Habakkuk 1:12. Tzur also indicates faithfulness (Deut. 32:4) and can be used as a synonym for God, as in Deuteronomy 32:18: “You deserted the Rock, who fathered you; you forgot the God who gave you birth.” The Lord calls himself a rock over which Israel will stumble (Isa. 8:14), and the New Testament sees Jesus as the embodiment of that rock of offense, who becomes the cornerstone of the new temple of God, the church (Luke 20:17–18; Rom. 9:33; Eph. 2:20; 1 Pet. 2:8). Paul also identifies Jesus as the Rock (hē petra) from which water gushed to quench the thirst of God’s people during their wilderness wanderings (1 Cor. 10:4).

Shepherd (Ro‘eh) or Shepherd of Israel (Ro‘eh Yisra’el). The latter phrase occurs in Psalm 80:1. Ancient kings were often called shepherds of their people. As shepherd, a king’s primary duty was to “feed the flock,” which was the nation over which he reigned. God takes the shepherds of Israel to task for leading them into idolatry and sin and causing them to abandon the worship of Yahweh, a violation of their responsibility to feed their people the law of the Lord (Jer. 23:1–2; Ezek. 34:2–10). As King of Israel, Yahweh is its Shepherd. Speaking to Israel, God declares, “You my sheep, the sheep of my pasture, are people, and I am your God” (Ezek. 34:31). David calls the Lord his Shepherd (Ps. 23:1) and describes God’s care and provision for him in terms of food (green pastures) and drink (quiet pools of water). Jesus identifies himself as the Good Shepherd, poimēn, who gives his life for the sheep (John 10:11). The writer of Hebrews calls him the “great Shepherd of the sheep” (13:20), and John pictures Jesus as the Lamb, who is the Shepherd in the midst of the worshiping church, feeding his flock and guiding them to living water (Rev. 7:16–17).

Ancient of Days (‘Attiq yomin). This term is an idiomatic Aramaic expression that literally means “aged one.” As it is used in Daniel 7:9, 13, and 22, it conveys the thought of the antiquity of God. Daniel’s description of the Ancient of Days with hair like white wool is echoed in Revelation 1:14, in which John sees “one like a son of man” standing in the midst of the golden lampstands, his head and hair “white like wool.” In using this language, John is identifying Jesus with Daniel’s Ancient of Days, or Yahweh, as he also does when he writes that Jesus was “in the beginning … with God” (John 1:1) and “before Abraham” (John 8:58).

God of Gods (’Elohei ha’ƒlohim). This phrase (Deut. 10:17) is an example of a Hebrew idiom that indicates a superlative. It does not mean there are other gods of whom Yahweh is the head but that he is the great and powerful God.

Lord of Lords (’Adonai ha’‡donim, Kurios kuriōn). This is another example of a Hebrew idiom (Deut. 10:17) that indicates a superlative. The phrase means “great and lordly Lord.” The idiom is carried over into the Greek (Rev. 19:16), although it is not idiomatic Greek, because the writers of the New Testament spoke and thought in a Semitic language. As a matter of fact, however, the covenant Lord is a Lord over other lords, since he is the great King in covenant with the priest-kings who make up the church (Rev. 1:6). As applied to Christ, the title is paired with “King of kings.”

Glory (Kavod). The Hebrew word kavod denotes glory in the sense of “mass, weight.” It refers to the radiant envelope or numinous aura of the manifest presence of the Lord. The Scriptures refer often to the glory of God, and occasionally the word glory stands for the Lord himself (Pss. 3:3; 89:17). This concept was more fully developed in the later Jewish Rabbinic writings, in which the word shƒkhinah (from the root shakhan, “dwell”) became synonymous with God himself in the sense of his abiding glory. (Shƒkhinah is not used in the Bible.)

Power (Dunamis). The power of God is made known in his Creation, his acts of deliverance, his miracles and wonders, and especially in the resurrection of Christ and the administration of his kingdom. Jesus uses the term Power as a synonym for God in responding to the Jewish high priest at his trial: “You shall see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of Power, and coming with the clouds of heaven” (Mark 14:62 nasb; cf. Luke 22:69).

Majesty (Megalōsunē). The august and majestic presence of the living God is expressed by this word, which literally means “greatness.” The author of Hebrews uses it twice as a substitute for “God” (Heb. 1:3; 8:1).

Almighty (Pantokratōr). The title means “ruler of all things” and is used mainly in the Revelation to John (though also by Paul, 2 Cor. 6:18). The Greek Old Testament often employed this term to translate the phrase “Yahweh of hosts,” and sometimes it appears in quotations from the Old Testament (Rev. 1:8; 4:8). As a title, “Almighty” is usually found in a context of judgment and wrath (Rev. 16:14; 19:15) and occurs several times in the majestic hymns of the Revelation (Rev. 11:17; 15:3; 16:7). In the renewed covenant of the new Jerusalem, “the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb” are the temple (Rev. 21:22).

Terms from Old Testament Worship Used to Interpret Christ

It is significant that the New Testament authors apply words and images from Israelite worship to Jesus Christ. In so doing, they show how the church sought to interpret Jesus, whom it recognized to be the Christ.

Jesus Christ, in his appearance as the incarnate Word of God, displayed a personal presence and power that moved people to an awed and worshipful response. When Jesus directed the Galilean fishermen to a miraculous catch, Peter fell at his feet, crying, “Go away from me, Lord; I am a sinful man!” (Luke 5:8). As a woman suffering from a hemorrhage touched the hem of his garment and was healed, Jesus sensed that power had gone out from him; in fear and trembling the woman fell down before him (Mark 5:25–34). The soldiers who came to arrest Jesus “drew back and fell to the ground” when he spoke (John 18:6). The resurrection of Christ further verified his identity as the one appointed by God to fulfill his purpose in the redemption of his people. This left the apostles with the task of explaining the crucifixion as a part of the divine plan. To do this, they drew on the work of the prophets of Israel, especially the portrait of the “servant” of the Lord found in the later chapters of Isaiah; they also drew on the imagery and terminology associated with the festal and sacrificial cultus of the Hebrew sanctuary, including the concept of atonement.

Atonement Terminology

The idea of atonement relates to the need to be shielded from the wrath of a holy God, yet not in the moral sense alone (that God is good and man is evil); rather it is because God is God, the Creator, and the worshiper is a finite creature that the gap between them must be bridged by some atoning act. The Creator is of surpassing worth; in contrast, the worshiper is as nothing before him. Atonement is a “covering” (the basic meaning of the Hebrew kafar) that provides a cleansing or consecration for the worshiper, enabling him or her to enter the presence of God and to have fellowship with him. Thus, by sacrifice atonement is made for priests, the people, and even for the sanctuary and the altar (for example, Lev. 16) that the profane might venture to approach the sacred and serve God’s purposes. In another connection, a leper who is cleansed must have atonement made through the slaughter of a male lamb (Lev. 14:1–20). The concept of atonement defies rational explanation but belongs to the realm of the “numinous,” or suprarational, intuitively experienced aspects of the holy.

The word atonement is not found in the New Testament, although a suggestion of its basic meaning is found in Peter’s statement that “love covers over a multitude of sins” (1 Pet. 4:8). But the concept of atonement underlies the apostolic proclamation that “Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures” (1 Cor. 15:3), and the New Testament theologians approach the mystery of the atonement using symbols drawn from Israelite worship. In this respect the apostles were following the example of Jesus himself, who had told them that the Son of Man had come “to give his life as a ransom for many” (Mark 10:45). The term lutron, “ransom,” relates to the Israelite concept of the redemption of the firstborn. The firstborn of clean animals were to be offered on the altar (Num. 18:17), but the firstborn of humans and of unclean animals were to be redeemed by a payment (Num. 18:15–16). As understood by the early Christians, however, the concept of ransom goes deeper, as a symbol interpreting the atonement of Christ.

Thus, in the New Testament, Christ’s death is called an offering or sacrifice; Hebrews calls his death “for all time one sacrifice [thusia] for sins” (Heb. 10:12), and Paul says that Christ “gave himself up for us as a fragrant offering [prosphora, something brought forward or presented] and sacrifice [thusia] to God” (Eph. 5:2), introducing also symbolism from the incense offerings of the Hebrew sanctuary. Paul’s declaration that God made Christ “who had no sin to be sin for us” (2 Cor. 5:21) also relates to the sacrificial rites; as applied to Christ, the word sin (hamartia) should be understood as “sin offering,” equivalent to the Hebrew ḥatta’t, the sacrifice that rehabilitates the worshiper after transgression. Hebrews elaborates on the concept of sacrifice as applied to the obedient death (under the figure of the “blood”) of Christ (Heb. 10:1–22) and also refers to our sanctification “through the offering [prosphora] of the body of Jesus Christ once for all” (Heb. 10:10 nasb); Christ is not only the sacrifice, but also the High Priest who offers it (Heb. 7:26–27).

The furnishings of the sanctuary also provide an image used to interpret the atoning death of Christ. In Romans 3:25, Paul refers to the redemption in Christ Jesus, “whom God displayed publicly as a propitiation in His blood through faith” (nasb). The word translated “propitiation” or “means of expiation” is hilastērion; the Septuagint (the Greek version of the Old Testament) uses this term for the lid of the ark of the covenant (Exod. 25:16–22), on which the blood of the sin offering was sprinkled on the Day of Atonement (Lev. 16:14). The apostle John employs a related term in declaring that if anyone sins, Jesus Christ, our Advocate with the Father, is himself “the propitiation [hilasmos] for our sins” (1 John 2:2; 4:10 nasb); the Septuagint uses this word in the sense of “sin offering” or “atonement” (Num. 5:8; Ezek. 44:27).

Imagery of the Lamb

The idea of atonement for sin is only part of the Old Testament worship symbolism the early Christians used to interpret the death of Christ. In the context of a discussion of judgment of immorality within the church, Paul compares Christ to the Passover lamb (1 Cor. 5:7–8). The Passover lamb was not a sin offering but the meal signifying the Lord’s covenant with the people he was about to deliver in the Exodus from Egypt; the blood of the Passover lamb marks the household of the people of the Lord for their protection during the time of divine judgment (Exod. 12:1–13). Thus, Paul urges the Christian community to separate itself from the “leaven” of unrighteousness, for “Christ our Passover [pascha] also has been sacrificed. Let us therefore celebrate the feast [heortazō] … with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth (1 Cor. 5:7–8 nasb)” the crucified christ is the Lamb whose blood identifies the true covenant community in the face of the wrath about to fall on the unfaithful.

The writings of the apostle John also use the slain lamb of Israelite worship as a symbol interpreting the crucified Christ; uniquely in the Johannine writings, Jesus is directly called “the Lamb.” In the gospel of John, John the Baptizer testifies to Jesus as “the Lamb of God [ho amnos tou theou], who takes away the sin of the world!” (John 1:29). However, the concept underlying this phrase does not seem to be atonement and sacrifice. It is noteworthy that in the Old Testament it was not a male lamb, but typically a bull, a ram, or a goat that was offered for sin (or, in the case of the scapegoat, driven away bearing the residual sin of the people, Lev. 16:20–22), yet the New Testament never likens Christ to any of these animals, but only to the lamb. How, then, does he “take away the sin of the world”? The thought seems to be that he does so through his victory over sin, in the utter obedience of his death on the cross. Christ’s obedience “to the point of death” is an important aspect of Paul’s Christology, but in Philippians 2:8 he relates it to Christ’s exaltation as Lord rather than to atonement for sin, just as the author of Hebrews relates Jesus’ endurance of the cross to his exaltation to the right hand of God (Heb. 12:2). In the same manner, the Revelation exclaims: “Worthy is the Lamb [arnion], who was slain, to receive power and wealth and wisdom and strength and honor and glory and praise!” (Rev. 5:12). Here Christ appears as the victorious Lamb, reigning with the Father as “KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS” (Rev. 19:16). He takes away sin, not only by his offering of himself, but by his victory and dominion over evil as the “great King” who delivers his covenant people from their enemies. He takes away sin through the power of his life, dwelling as God himself in the midst of his people, the new Jerusalem (Rev. 21:1–8). He takes away sin through the radiance of his presence, as the temple of the holy city and its light: “I did not see a temple in the city, because the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple [naos]. The city does not need the sun or the moon to shine on it, for the glory of God gives it light, and the Lamb is its lamp [luchnos]” (Rev. 21:22–23). Here, through the figure of the Lamb, Christ is compared also to the lamp of the sanctuary.

Light and Glory

Imagery of light or radiance, so familiar from Israel’s worship of the Lord, is applied also to Jesus Christ in the New Testament. Jesus is the “light of the world” (to phōs tou kosmou, John 8:12), the “radiance [apaugasma] of God’s glory [doxa]” (Heb. 1:3). The apostles witness Jesus transfigured in brightness like the sun (Matt. 17:2); John beholds his face “like the sun shining in all its brilliance” (Rev. 1:16). New Testament witnesses affirm that in Christ we behold “the light of the knowledge of the glory [doxa] of God in the face of Christ” (2 Cor. 4:6 rsv), that “we have seen his glory [doxa], the glory of the One and Only, who came from the Father” (John 1:14). As the glory of God, Christ is also “the image [eikōn] of the invisible God” (Col. 1:15 rsv), the “exact representation [charaktēr] of his being” (Heb. 1:3). This language originates in the festal worship of Israel, which centered in the theophany or manifestation of the Lord, as his glory [kavod] appeared to his people or filled the holy place. In the Sinai covenant, Yahweh descended on the mountain in fire (Exod. 19:18). In Israel’s subsequent worship of the Lord, which was a continual renewal of the covenant, his glory manifested itself, so that “from Zion, perfect in beauty, God shines forth” (Ps. 50:2). No image could be made of Yahweh, but his “glory,” the radiant envelope of his presence, was understood to be enthroned over the ark of the covenant. This concept further illuminates the application of the term hilastērion, “mercy seat,” to Jesus Christ, for the mercy seat was the place where Yahweh was to meet with his people, speaking to them “from between the two cherubim that are upon the ark of the testimony” (Exod. 25:22 rsv). As the triumphant Passover Lamb and as the representation of God’s glory, Christ maintains and defends the covenant between the Lord and his faithful people and is the Word (logos) through whom God speaks to his people (John 1:1, 14; 1 John 1:1; Rev. 19:13).

The Curse of the Covenant

Understanding the covenantal foundation of Israelite, and Christian, worship sheds light on another expression used by the apostle Paul, who declares, “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse [katara] for us, for it is written: ‘Cursed is everyone who is hung on a tree’ ” (Gal. 3:13). The biblical covenant is modeled on the ancient treaty, which included both stipulations and sanctions in the form of blessings if the covenant is maintained and curses that take effect if it is broken. In the Bible, the clearest example is Moses’ farewell sermon in Deuteronomy (Paul was quoting from Deut. 21:23 in the Galatians passage), a description of a covenant liturgy that closes with an extended ceremony of blessing and, especially, cursing (Deut. 27–28; 32–33). The curse element in the covenant liturgy was what generated the pronouncements of the prophets of Israel and Judah; in their declarations of judgment against the nation, they were announcing the outworking of the curse of the covenant as the consequence of its violation by an unfaithful people. Paul sees Christ, who died on the “tree,” as having borne this curse so that the covenant, broken by its original grantees, may now be renewed with the new “Israel of God” (Gal. 6:16) made up of both Jew and Gentile. Jesus understood his own death in this way, as is clear from his prayer in Gethsemane, when he asks the Father to “take this cup from me” (Luke 22:42). The cup of poison was one of the curses traditionally administered to covenant breakers; in his death, Jesus is to bear this curse on behalf of the unfaithful, that others might be set free to enter the kingdom of God. In the Revelation, John sees that in the new Jerusalem “no longer will there be any curse” (Rev. 22:3), for the Lamb receives the homage of the community of the new covenant.

Imagery Relating to Gentile Inclusion

The inclusion of Gentiles in the covenant, through the death of Christ, is the great “mystery” or now-revealed truth Paul celebrates (Eph. 3:3–7). In explaining this mystery, Paul uses additional terminology drawn from Old Testament worship.“He [Christ] himself is our peace [eirēnē], who has made the two one” (Eph. 2:14). In the Bible, peace (shalom) is that state of blessing and salvation which is the purpose and effect of the covenant, but one gets the impression here that, in speaking of Christ as our “peace,” Paul is thinking specifically of the peace offering (shelem), which in Israelite worship was a sacrifice that restored and maintained fellowship between the worshiper and the Lord. Both Jew and Gentile were condemned as “objects of wrath” under the old covenant (Eph. 2:3), the Gentiles as “foreigners to the covenants of the promise” (Eph. 2:12) and the Jews as disobedient (Eph. 2:3). But Christ in his death has reconciled both groups to God (Eph. 2:16), building them together into “a holy temple [naos],” “a dwelling of God in the Spirit” (Eph. 2:21–22 nasb). The image of the Israelite sanctuary as emblematic of the union of Jew and Gentile in Christ also occurs in the statement of James during the apostolic council recorded in Acts 15. Here the inclusion of Gentiles in the people of God is viewed as the fulfillment of Amos’s prophecy concerning the restoration of the booth, or tent (skēnē), of David (Acts 15:16–17; Amos 9:11); the tabernacle was the original tent that housed the ark after David had it brought to Zion and for which he directed continual prophetic, nonsacrificial worship as reflected throughout the book of Psalms (1 Chron. 15–16).

Sabbath Imagery

The epistle to the Hebrews employs the imagery of the Sabbath in interpreting the event of Jesus Christ. Whereas the disobedient and unbelieving are excluded from entering God’s rest (Heb. 3:18–19), “there remains a sabbath rest for the people of God” (Heb. 4:9 rsv). The thought seems to be that by his sacrifice of himself, Jesus the “Great High Priest” has become the Sabbath rest of the believer, who “rests from his own work, just as God did from his” (Heb. 4:10).

Conclusion

The New Testament thus applies much of the worship vocabulary of the Old Testament to its understanding of Jesus Christ and his new covenant community. But there is a new spirituality to the use of these terms; they are employed not to describe external acts or features of worship but as a means of grasping the inward significance of the event of Jesus Christ. As the writer of Hebrews says, “You have not come to a mountain that can be touched … But you have come to Mount Zion, to the heavenly Jerusalem, the city of the living God … to Jesus the mediator of a new covenant” (Heb. 12:18, 22, 24). The same spirituality that infuses the Christians’ use of the terminology of Hebrew worship is now to transform their worship as well. In Jesus’ words to the woman of Samaria, the Father is to be worshiped “neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem” (John 4:21) but by genuine worshipers who “will worship the Father in spirit and truth” (John 4:23).

A WAY OF LIFE

When we were living in Willits, CA, a friend from church took me and my oldest son Chris to the Nostalgia Drags in Sacramento. These were the old, vintage dragsters and hot rods from the 1960s.

Some things were exactly how I remembered them in the mid-60s, but some were not — like the jet-dragster! I honestly didn’t remember the sound level, so I stood about 50 feet away from the starting line, with no ear protection — and my hearing has never been the same!

Anyway, the stands were packed with people, and to my delightful surprise, the races began with an opening prayer to Jesus Christ! Wow — I was impressed! As the day went on, I discovered that a chapel service was held that morning for drivers who were believers! In fact, one driver had painted on the nose of his dragster, “Got Jesus?” Apparently he did — and Jesus must have been driving because this guy creamed everybody he raced!

Ya know, it would be easy for pious church-goers to sit in judgment on these Christian drivers and their crews: “What’s a Christian doing racing on Sunday? He oughta be in church — or at home with his family! It’s the Lord’s day, a day of rest!”

People like that with attitudes like that are missing the point of our faith! Worshipping God is not something we do on Sunday only it’s a way of life! I worked every Sunday, for 30+ years as a pastor! I wonder if this self-appointed sin-patrol is thankful that our Christian police officers work on Sunday.

I truly believe the Christian men and women that race on Sunday are gifted and skilled by God to build and race cars! That’s a way of life for them — and hopefully, they are using their talents to glorify God and provide for their families.

Hopefully, our chosen way of life is bringing glory to our great God and blessing to our loved ones.