The Preaching of Augustine (354–430)

Augustine represents the preaching of the Latin church, a style that may be traced from Tertullian through Cyprian to Ambrose, Augustine’s spiritual father, and mentor. The Latin style of preaching shows an acquaintance with classical literature, Latin rhetoric, and symbolism.

Augustine addresses the matter of homiletics in the fourth book of De Doctrina Christiana. He basically argues that the sermon should be an exposition of the text. Concerning approach, he urges the speaker to appeal to the intellect, feeling, and will (to teach, delight, and influence). He mentions three styles of preaching—the restrained, the moderate, and the grand. He advises against the grandiose style, however, because audiences will not tolerate it. Augustine makes a strong case for a restrained style in which the form of the sermon reflects the content.

Augustine has written works of very high literary merit, apart from his theological and homiletical writings. His Confessions form one of the most unique and strangely impressive works in all literature—one of the books that everybody ought by all means to read. His City of God has been called a “prose epic” and is a combination of history, philosophy, and poetry that has a power and a charm all its own. His work on Christian Teaching is the first treatise on sacred rhetoric and homiletics.

Augustine’s Sermons

But if we had nothing else from Augustine than his sermons, of which some 360 remain that are reckoned genuine, we should recognize him as a great preacher, as a richly gifted man, and should feel ourselves powerfully attracted and impressed by his genius, his mighty will, his passionate heart, and deeply earnest piety.

Augustine favored allegorizing, like every other great preacher of the age except Chrysostom. But his sermons are full of power. He carefully explains his text and repeats many times, in different ways, its substantial meaning. He deals much in dramatic question and answers, and in apostrophe; also in digression, the use of familiar phrases, and direct address to particular classes of persons present, using in general great and notable freedom. Yet freedom must be controlled, as in Augustine it commonly is controlled by sound judgment, right feeling, and good taste.

The chief peculiarity of Augustine’s style is his fondness for and skill in producing pithy phrases. In the terse and vigorous Latin, these often have great power. The capacity for throwing off such phrases is mainly natural, but may be indefinitely cultivated. And it is a great element of power, especially in addressing the masses, if one can, after stating some truth, condense it into a single keen phrase that will penetrate the hearer’s mind and stick.

Worship in the New Testament Era

Worship in the New Testament period was ordered around baptism and the Eucharist. Baptism marks the entrance of the believer into the worshiping community, while the Lord’s Supper, together with the teaching of the Scriptures, forms the content of the worship gathering.

The Oral-Formal Tradition

Early Christian liturgy, like its Jewish and pagan counterparts, was an oral-formal phenomenon. The early liturgical gatherings were not lacking in basic shape and structure, in the use of specific confessional formulas, and structures of prayer. Although what was said allowed for improvisation and adaptation, it was not by any means “extemporaneous” in our modern sense. It followed rules, essentially unwritten, but important for that very reason to be observed by those responsible for their conduct if others were to take their appropriate parts. But it was, in principle and practice, not something to be written down for reading in the manner of later times. Those familiar with the classical tradition of poetry and oratory, and of public speaking or rhetoric more generally, will at once recognize here an assumption as natural to that time as it is foreign to ours.

The oral-formal character of early Christian liturgy helps to explain the general value placed on liturgical language as a means of appropriating and transmitting the Christian proclamation (tradition, paradosis), as in the famous dictum of Prosper of Aquitaine that the structure of prayer underlies the structure of belief (Lex orandi statuat legem credendi). But it has a specific significance for the study of the sources that provide us with descriptions of liturgical gatherings. These sources were written only in particular circumstances, with the specific purposes of preservation, explanation, and—often most important—when there was a dispute over what should be done and said. These sources are mishandled when studied as if they were extracts of liturgical books of the sort with which we are familiar. They need to be studied in the light of the particular purposes that impelled their writing in the time before circumstances made continuation of the oral-formal tradition difficult.

The Physical Evidence

Early Christian liturgy, like that of any period, is physical as well as vocal. The physical evidence of places used for liturgical gatherings has at last begun to receive the attention it deserves. This evidence includes the so-called “house churches” (“Christian houses” or sometimes, by an obvious association, “temples of the Christians”), renovated domestic structures of which we have increasing evidence from the second century onward. It also includes the baptisteries and basilicas, and the complexes of buildings of which they were part, erected under the auspices of Constantine and his successors following the period of persecution. These all, whether still in use or in ruins, tell us much about the character and significance of the rites for which they made physical provision. So, too, do the pictorial evidence of the catacombs at Rome, and elsewhere, and the wall decorations of the later buildings—which show us the people who gathered for the Christian meetings and the vesture and furnishings with which they were familiar.

The New Testament Evidence

Particular problems are posed by our earliest written sources. Many but by no means all of these writings were later collected into the New Testament. The rest were designated “Apostolic Fathers” by the Anglican patristic scholar Archbishop James Ussher (d. a.d. 1656). For our purposes, all of these writings provide evidence of the liturgical practices of the communities of the first and early second centuries. Those later regarded as “Scriptures,” however, must also be studied for their subsequent liturgical influence. A case in point is the command of Matthew 28:19–20 to baptize into the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, itself an interpretation of the significance of baptism rather than a liturgical formula, which had a wide influence on later catechetical and baptismal practice. Another is the Last Supper tradition of 1 Corinthians 11:23–25 (cf. Mark 14:22–24; Matt. 26:26–28; Luke 22:17–19), once again not itself a liturgical formula, which became the institution narrative incorporated into later eucharistic prayers.

The Writings of Paul. Among the writings that later became part of the New Testament, the Pauline letters deserve special attention. 1 Corinthians contains our earliest references to baptismal practice, at least in the negative sense of insisting that it is baptism “into the name” of Christ rather than that of the baptizer (1:15). It also contains our earliest references to eucharistic practice in the form of instructions for the observance of the blessings over the bread and wine mandated by the Last Supper tradition (11:17–34), with its own even earlier implication that the Eucharist is a “memorial” of the new paschal sacrifice of Christ (cf. 1 Cor. 5:7–8). In both cases, these rites are interpreted by Paul as entrance into and sustenance in the life of the members of the body of Christ affected by the Holy Spirit (12:12–31).

The Gospels. The synoptic gospels, however different in genre from the Pauline letters, must also be read as documents intended for communities constituted by baptism and Eucharist. Here baptismal allusions include a reference to Jesus’ death as a baptism foreshadowing the martyrdoms of principal disciples (Mark 10:38–40; Luke 12:50). Moreover, in Matthew, the account of the baptism of Jesus is so treated as to anticipate the new relationship to God, in Christ, through the Spirit in which the baptized stand, and into which others are to be brought. Indeed, the command of Matthew 28:19–20 (“make disciples … baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them … ”) may well assume a pattern of practice, conversion, baptism, and catechesis [instruction] not unlike that assumed by Paul.

Synoptic eucharistic allusions abound. The accounts of the miraculous feedings (Mark 6:41–42; 8:6–8; Matt. 14:19–20; 15:36–37; Luke 9:16–17), which employ the technical language of “taking, blessing over, breaking, and giving,” almost certainly were viewed in the churches as foreshadowings of the Eucharist before their incorporation into the gospel narratives. Moreover, the passion narrative includes a form or forms of the Last Supper tradition (cf. 1 Cor. 11:23–25) placing the last meal on the day of the slaughter of the Passover lambs. This is a crucial element in the tradition’s view of Jesus’ death as a new Passover sacrifice. Whatever the historical accuracy of this narrative, it incorporates an already established “tradition” conveying this interpretation of the death of Jesus through the use of eucharistic terminology familiar to its readers.

Of particular interest is Luke 24:13–35, where the appearance of the risen Christ to the disciples at Emmaus is recounted in language reminiscent of a eucharistic meal, perhaps even suggesting familiarity with an introductory interpretation of the Scriptures but certainly employing the technical language of “taking, blessing over, breaking, and giving” at the supper of which the risen Christ is the host.

In the gospel of John, baptismal and eucharistic allusions are carefully disguised. However, the subject of baptism is easily recognized in the discussion between Jesus and Nicodemus over being “born again” through the Spirit (John 3:1–15), while allusion is again made to the baptism with which the disciples must be baptized (16:1). Similarly, while John replaces the Last Supper “tradition” with the account of the washing of the disciples’ feet and its accompanying command (13:3–11), he gives a eucharistic interpretation with the miraculous feeding (6:25–65) and to the discussion of the vine and branches at the last meal (15:1–17). Baptism and Eucharist are doubtless to be discerned in the references to water and wine (or blood) in the account of the marriage feast at Cana (2:1–11) and in the passion narrative (19:34).

Other New Testament Evidence. Among the other writings now collected in the New Testament, special interest centers on the book of Hebrews, which exhorts those who have been baptized and have participated in the Eucharist to resist apostasy in the face of persecution (6:1–8), and was later appealed to (by Cyprian) as grounds for rigorous refusal to restore apostates to the communion of the church. 1 Peter, whether or not it is the baptismal instruction some have found it to be, assumes that its readers belong to the community of the baptized (1:3, 21–23; 2:2) and are eucharistic participants (2:5). Revelation, which describes its vision as received on the Lord’s Day (1:9–10), has been thought to reflect a structure of scriptural interpretation and eucharistic action and certainly promises the martyrs “hidden manna” and “a new name” at the final “wedding supper of the Lamb” (2:17; 19:7–9).

More specific references to baptismal and eucharistic practice are found in the Acts of the Apostles. While something like a paradigmatic sequence of repentance, baptism “into the name of Jesus Christ,” and the gift of the Spirit, seems to be assumed (2:38), the accounts of baptism (presumably drawn from diverse sources) do not exhibit this sequence in practice (8:9–16, 26–40; 10:44–48). The reference to a daily “breaking of bread” in the primitive Jerusalem community (2:46), if it is eucharistic, is unusual in view of the normal practice of meeting for the Eucharist on the Lord’s Day. But clearer, even graphic, is the account of Paul’s healing of Eutychus during a meeting for the “breaking of bread” at Troas (20:7–12), presumably on the evening of the end of the Sabbath and the beginning of the Lord’s Day on the Jewish reckoning of days from sunset.

Evidence for the Origin of Daily Prayer

Jewish Hours of Prayer. In the Temple at Jerusalem sacrifices were normally offered only twice each day, in the morning and in the evening, with additional offerings being made on Sabbaths and festivals. In the case of ordinary Jews not connected with the temple cult, however, there is evidence of some variety in prayer times. While all Jews would have offered prayer at mealtimes, some also recited the Shƒma‘ (Deut. 6:4–9; 11:13–21; Num. 15:37–41) twice a day, and others apparently followed a custom of praying three times a day (cf. Dan. 6:10). By the first century the middle of these times, probably originally observed at noon, had become associated—at least by some—with the hour of the evening sacrifice in the temple, the ninth hour of the day, which is around 3 p.m. in our reckoning (Acts 3:1). These prayers would have been said both by individuals on their own and by groups gathering together at home or in the synagogue. In the Jewish community at Qumran, more time seems to have been devoted to prayer, with sections of the community taking turns to maintain a vigil of meditation on God’s law throughout each night.

The Jewish tradition of prayer centers around the temple, the synagogue, and the home. The following texts evidence the practice of prayer throughout the day and confirm the continued involvement of Jesus and the early Christians in the Jewish practice of daily prayer.

Jesus. “Very early in the morning, while it was still dark, Jesus got up, left the house and went off to a solitary place, where he prayed” (Mark 1:35). “After he had dismissed them, he went up on a mountainside by himself to pray. When evening came, he was there alone” (Matt. 14:23; see also Mark 6:46; John 6:15; Luke 6:12).

The Disciples. The third hour: “These men are not drunk, as you suppose. It is only nine in the morning!” (Acts 2:15). The sixth hour: “About noon the following day as they … were approaching the city, Peter went up on the roof to pray” (Acts 10:9). The ninth hour: “Cornelius answered: ‘Four days ago I was in my house praying at this hour, at three in the afternoon’ ” (Acts 10:30, see also Acts 10:3; 3:1). Evening prayer: “About midnight Paul and Silas were praying and singing hymns to God, and the other prisoners were listening to them” (Acts 16:25).

Early Christians. “Every day they continued to meet together in the temple courts. They broke bread in their homes and ate together with glad and sincere hearts” (Acts 2:46). “When he had led them out to the vicinity of Bethany, he lifted up his hands and blessed them. While he was blessing them, he left them and was taken up into heaven. Then they worshiped him and returned to Jerusalem with great joy. And they stayed continually at the temple, praising God” (Luke 24:50–53).

Daily Prayer in the First Three Centuries. The early Christians continued the Jewish practice of praying at mealtimes and at set hours of the day. The Didachē, a primitive Christian manual of instruction, prescribes prayer three times a day; Clement of Alexandria and Origen in the third century refer to a similar custom in Egypt, as well as to prayer in the night. At the same period in North Africa, however, Tertullian and Cyprian describe a more extensive pattern of daily prayer. They believe that the only absolute apostolic injunction is to “pray without ceasing” (1 Thess. 5:17, NRSV), but they both recommend that, in order to fulfill this, Christians should pray no less than five times a day—in the morning, at the third, sixth, and ninth hours (about 9 a.m., noon, and 3 p.m.), and in the evening—and should also pray again in the middle of the night. Their evidence is largely supported by the ancient church order known as the Apostolic Tradition, although it is difficult to know how much of this part of the document really does go back to the third century.

Psalms were apparently not commonly used at these times of prayer; Tertullian says that the more assiduous included those psalms featuring the “Alleluia” response—thereby implying that the rest did not. Instead, they were generally sung at meals, and especially at the agapē, where various individuals sang either a hymn they had composed or one of the canonical psalms to the others, who responded to each verse with an ‘Alleluia’ refrain (see also 1 Cor. 14:26; Eph. 5:18–20; Col. 3:16). Bible reading would have been a part of the daily devotions of those few Christians wealthy enough to own copies of the Scriptures, but for the majority, this activity would have been restricted to catechetical classes and occasional services of the Word during the week. Below is an example from the early third century written by Hippolytus in The Apostolic Tradition:

Let every faithful man and woman, when they have risen from sleep in the morning before they touch any work at all, wash their hands and pray to God, and so go to their work. But if instruction in the word of God is given, each one should choose to go to that place, reckoning in his heart that it is God whom he hears in the instructor.

For he who prays in the church will be able to pass by the wickedness of the day. He who is pious should think it is a great evil if he does not go to the place where instruction is given, and especially if he can read, or if a teacher comes. Let none of you be late in the church, the place where teaching is given. Then it shall be given to the speaker to say what is useful to each one; you will hear things which you do not think of and profit from things which the Holy Spirit will give you through the instructor. In this way, your faith will be strengthened about the things you will have heard. You will also be told in that place what you ought to do at home. Therefore let each one be diligent in coming to the church, the place where the Holy Spirit flourishes. If there is a day when there is no instruction, let each one, when he is at home, take up a holy book and read in it sufficiently what seemest to him to bring profit.

And if you are at home, pray at the third hour and bless God. But if you are somewhere else at that moment, pray to God in your heart. For at that hour Christ was nailed to the tree. For this reason also in the Old (Testament), the Law prescribed that the shewbread should be offered continually as a type of the body and blood of Christ; and the slaughter of the lamb without reason is this type of the perfect lamb. For Christ is the shepherd, and also the bread which came down from heaven.

Pray likewise at the time of the sixth hour. For when Christ was nailed to the wood of the cross, the day was divided, and darkness fell. And so at that hour let them pray a powerful prayer, imitating the voice of him who prayed and made all creation dark for the unbelieving Jews.

And at the ninth hour let them pray also a great prayer and a great blessing, to know the way in which the soul of the righteous blesses God who does not lie, who remembered his saints and sent the word to give them light. For at that hour Christ was pierced in his side and poured out water and blood; giving light to the rest of the time of the day, he brought it to evening. Then, in beginning to sleep and making the beginning of another day, he fulfilled the type of the resurrection.

Pray before your body rests on the bed. Rise about midnight, wash your hands with water, and pray. If your wife is present also, pray both together; if she is not yet among the faithful, go apart into another room and pray, and go back to bed again. Do not be lazy about praying. He who is bound in the marriage-bond is not defiled.

Those who have washed have no need to wash again, for they are clean. By signing yourself with moist breath and catching your spittle in your hand, your body is sanctified down to your feet. For when (prayer) is offered with a believing heart as though from the font, the gift of the Spirit and the sprinkling of baptism sanctify him who believes. Therefore it is necessary to pray at this hour.

For the elders who gave us the tradition taught us that at that hour all creation is still for a moment, to praise the Lord; stars, trees, waters stop for an instant, and all the host of angels (which) ministers to him praises God with the souls of the righteous in this hour. That is why believers should take good care to pray at this hour.

Bearing witness to this, the Lord says thus, “Lo, about midnight a shout was made of men saying, Lo, the bridegroom comes; rise to meet him.” And he goes on saying, “Watch, therefore, for you know not at what hour he comes.”

And likewise, rise about cockcrow, and pray. For at that hour, as the cock crew, the children of Israel denied Christ, whom we know by faith, our eyes looking towards that day in the hope of eternal light at the resurrection of the dead.

And if you act so, all you faithful, and remember these things, and teach them in your turn, and encourage the catechumens, you will not be able to be tempted or to perish, since you have Christ always in memory.

Cathedral Prayer East and West

After the conversion of Constantine in the early fourth century, the daily public celebration of morning and evening prayer became a regular practice in major towns and cities. A few places, including Jerusalem, which had become a great pilgrimage center, had more frequent services each day, and it was hoped everywhere that individuals and families might still continue to pray at the other hours of the day that had been observed by Christians in the third century, but only the exceptionally pious appear to have done so.

Because the clergy and people would generally gather under the presidency of their bishop for these daily liturgies, they are usually referred to by scholars as “cathedral” offices. They consisted principally of praise and intercession. The praise was expressed in selected psalms and canticles—non-canonical compositions as well as biblical songs—usually unchanging from day to day, except for Sundays and festivals. Thus, for example, Psalms 148–150 became established as the universal morning song of praise, while the hymn “Hail, Gladdening Light” was a common evening canticle, generally accompanying ritual lighting of the lamp (Lucernarium).

Scripture reading was not a part of these daily offices, but was still generally restricted to catechetical classes and occasional services of the Word during the week, as it had been in the third century, and to vigil services, which seem to be a new development. We have descriptions of an early morning vigil service on Sundays, which seems to have originated in Jerusalem as a weekly commemoration of the Resurrection and included the gospel account of the death and resurrection of Jesus, and also of an all-night vigil on Fridays composed of psalms and Bible readings. The latter, however, may be a result of monastic influence.

An excellent description of these services is found in the writings of Egeria, who in a visit to Jerusalem, reported them thus:

Loving sisters, I am sure it will interest you to know about the daily services they have in the holy places, and I must tell you about them. All the doors of the Anastasis are opened before cock-crow each day, and the “monazontes and parthenae,” as they call them here, come in, and also some laymen and women, at least those who are willing to wake at such an early hour. From then until daybreak they join in singing the refrains to the hymns, psalms, and antiphons. There is a prayer between each of the hymns since there are two or three presbyters and deacons each day by rota, who are there with the monazontes and say the prayers between all the hymns and antiphons.

As soon as dawn comes, they start the morning hymns, and the bishop with his clergy comes and joins them. He goes straight into the cave, and inside the screen, he first says the Prayer for All (mentioning any names he wishes) and blesses the catechumens, and then another prayer and blesses the faithful. Then he comes outside the screen, and everyone comes up to kiss his hand. He blesses them one by one and goes out, and by the time the dismissal takes place, it is already day.

Again at mid-day everyone comes into the Anastasis and says psalms and antiphons until a message is sent to the bishop. Again he enters, and, without taking his seat, goes straight inside the screen in the Anastasis (which is to say into the cave where he went in the early morning), and again, after a prayer, he blesses the faithful and comes outside the screen, and again they come to kiss his hand.

At three o’clock they do once more what they did at mid-day, but at four o’clock they have Lychnion, as they call it, or in our language, Lucernare. All the people congregate once more in the Anastasis, and the lamps and candles are all lit, which makes it very bright. The fire is brought not from outside, but from the cave—inside the screen—where a lamp is always burning night and day. For some time they have the Lucernare psalms and antiphons; then they send for the bishop, who enters and sits in the chief seat. The presbyters also come and sit in their places, and the hymns and antiphons go on. Then, when they have finished singing everything which is appointed, the bishop rises and goes in front of the screen (i.e., the cave). One of the deacons makes the normal commemoration of individuals, and each time he mentions a name a large group of boys responds Kyrie eleison (in our language, “Lord, have mercy”). Their voices are very loud. As soon as the deacon has done his part, the bishop says a prayer and prays the Prayer for All. Up to this point, the faithful and the catechumens are praying together, but now the deacon calls every catechumen to stand where he is and bow his head, and the bishop says the blessing over the catechumens from his place. There is another prayer, after which the deacon calls for all the faithful to bow their heads, and the bishop says the blessing over the faithful from his place. Thus the dismissal takes place at the Anastasis, and they all come up one by one to kiss the bishop’s hand.

Then, singing hymns, they take the bishop from the Anastasis to the Cross, and everyone goes with him. On arrival, he says one prayer and blesses the catechumens, then another and blesses the faithful. Then again the bishop and all the people go behind the cross and do there what they did before the cross, and in both places, they come to kiss the bishop’s hand, as they did in many candles in front of the Anastasis, and also before and behind the cross. By the end of all this, it is dusk. So there are the services held every weekday at the cross and at the Anastasis.

Monastic Prayers East and West

There had always been some Christians whose spirituality was not satisfied with frequent times of prayer during the day but who wished to fulfill more literally the injunction to “pray without ceasing.” This attitude was inherited by the Egyptian desert fathers of the fourth century, whose aim was to maintain as near as possible a ceaseless vigil of meditation, punctuated only by the minimal interruption for food and sleep. As monastic communities proper emerged in Egypt, however, more formalized rules of prayer were established, which, while expecting the monk to persevere in praying throughout his waking hours, prescribed two particular occasions of prayer each day, on rising in the morning and before retiring to bed at night. John Cassian’s description captures the spirit of these daily devotions, even if he appears to have mingled together with the practices of Upper Egypt with the somewhat different customs of Lower Egypt. As can be seen, their basic purpose was not praise and intercession, but silent meditation on the Word of God heard in the Psalms and/or Scripture readings.

Monastic communities in other parts of the East and West followed rather different customs. They tended to preserve the times of prayer formerly observed by all Christians in the third century—morning, third, sixth, and ninth hours, evening, and during the night—and sometimes added further hours to these, often including a weekly all-night vigil. But, influenced by the Egyptian desert fathers, the content of all these services was generally meditation on psalms and Bible readings.

Below is an example of monastic prayer as seen in the writings of John Cassian:

One rose up in the midst to chant the Psalms to the Lord. And while they were all sitting (as is still the custom in Egypt), with their minds intently fixed on the words of the chanter, when he had sung eleven Psalms, separated by prayers introduced between them, verse after verse being evenly enunciated, he finished the twelfth with a response of Alleluia, and then, by his sudden disappearance from the eyes of all, put an end at once to their discussion and their service.

Whereupon the venerable assembly of the Fathers understood that by divine providence a general rule had been fixed for the congregations of the brethren through the angel’s direction, and so decreed that this number should be preserved both in their evening and in their nocturnal services; and when they added to these two lessons, one from the Old and one from the New Testament, they added them simply as extras and of their own appointment, only for those who liked, and who were eager to gain by constant study a mind well stored with Holy Scripture. But on Saturday and Sunday they read them both from the New Testament; viz., one from the Epistles or the Acts of the Apostles, and one from the Gospel. And this also those do whose concern is the reading and the recollection of the Scriptures, from Easter to Whitsuntide [Pentecost].

These aforesaid prayers, then, they begin and finish in such a way that when the psalm is ended they do not hurry at once to kneel down, as some of us do in this country.… Among them, therefore it is not so, but before they bend their knees they pray for a few moments and while they are standing up spend the greater part of the time in prayer. And so after this, for the briefest space of time, they prostrate themselves to the ground, as if but adoring the divine mercy, and as soon as possible rise up, and again standing erect with outspread hands—just as they had been standing to pray before—remain with thoughts intent upon their prayers.… But when he who is to “collect” the prayer rises from the ground they all start up at once, so that no one would venture to bend the knee before he bows down, nor to delay when he has risen from the ground, lest it should be thought that he has offered his own prayer independently instead of following the leader to the close.

That practice too which we have observed in this country—viz., that while one sings to the end of the psalm, all standing up singing together with a loud voice, “Glory be to the Father and to the Son and to the Holy Ghost”—we have never heard anywhere throughout the East, but there, while all keep silence when the psalm is finished, the prayer that follows is offered up by the singer. But with this hymn in honor of the Trinity, only the whole psalmody is usually ended.

When, then, they meet together to celebrate the aforementioned rites, which they term synaxes, they are all so perfectly silent that, though so large a number of the brethren is assembled together, you would not think a single person was present except the one who stands up and chants the psalm in the midst; and especially is this the case when the prayer is completed, for then there is no spitting, no clearing of the throat, or noise of coughing, no sleepy yawning with open mouths, and gasping, and no groans or sighs are uttered, likely to distract those standing near. No voice is heard save that of the priest concluding the prayer.… They think it best for the prayers to be short and offered up very frequently.

And, therefore, they do not even attempt to finish the psalms, which they sing in the service, by an unbroken and continuous recitation. But they repeat them separately and bit by bit, divided into two or three sections, according to the number of verses, with prayers in between. For they do not care about the number of verses, but about the intelligence of the mind, aiming with all their might at this: “I will sing with the spirit: I will sing also with the understanding.” And so they consider it better for ten verses to be sung with understanding and thought than for a whole psalm to be poured forth with a bewildered mind. Except for Vespers and Nocturns, there are no public services among them during the day except on Saturday and Sunday, when they meet together at the third hour for the purpose of holy communion.

Cyprian, Thascius Caecilius

Thascius Caecilius Cyprian (c. 200-258) was the son of a wealthy Roman officer. He led a privileged life as a young man and received an excellent education. As an adult, he became a Christian and turned his back on his family’s affluence to embrace the study of the Scriptures and asceticism. In about 250 he was named bishop of North Africa, after serving for a year as presbyter in Carthage. This was a difficult time in the church as severe persecutions raged and various cults and heresies arose. He went into hiding to escape capture but maintained contact with his churches through regular correspondence. In 251 he returned to Carthage to preside over the affairs of the church. In 257, during a persecution by Valerian, he was tried and executed. His writings set Peter as the Apostle whom all bishops succeed, establishing a church government and order of unity that continues to this day.