Despite objections, the Scriptures offer a solid foundation for the continuation of dance in the worship of today’s church.
Opponents to dance in the church have sometimes objected that dancing is worldly entertainment and should be avoided by Christians. However, a human being’s inherent rhythm, demonstrated unequivocally by the natural response of a small child to music, is a gift of God, and dance, therefore, belongs to our nature. If the world has taken it over, it must also be admitted that it has invaded the area of music and songwriting as well, but the church continues to make use of both of these in the worship of the Lord. The church should not abdicate its leadership in the use of dance, leaving the only expression of this joyous activity to the corruption of the world. Whatever the enemy has done to make dance a worldly form of amusement does not invalidate the teaching of the Bible on this subject.
Not everyone in the church will dance. Some have argued that the use of dance in worship will put undue pressure on all worshipers to do so and may serve to exclude persons who are not physically able to join in this activity. The logic in this argument is faulty. The church does not cease to sing when the mute is present, nor does it disallow musical instruments and choirs because not everyone can play or sing. Certainly, it does not ban the lifting of hands in praise for the sake of arthritics who may be in the congregation, or the reading of Scripture for the sake of not excluding the blind, or kneeling because the handicapped may be present. Dancing is one of a multitude of ways in which believers can bless God, and it should be made available to church congregations so that they are free to make the choice to dance.
Some say that if dancing is done before the Lord it should take place only in an individual’s private worship. This argument, if carried to its logical conclusion, would do away with public prayer and the congregational singing of hymns directed to God.
Others object to the wearing of special clothing by dancers or the decoration of their tambourines with streamers, assuming that the dancers are attempting to please their audiences. One could as easily say that a minister who wears a nice suit or a clerical robe is doing the same. Dance attire is part of a worshiper’s preparation for worship; not all clothing is suitable for the purpose. Special gowns for worship dance usually ensure modesty and allow for freedom of movement. When dancers wear uniform dress they draw attention to the corporate group rather than to themselves individually.
Should dancing be prohibited in the church because some Christians may be offended by it? While dancing is now accepted by a growing number of churches, obedience should never be determined by a majority vote. Should Christians cease lifting their hands to the Lord because people in some churches are offended by the practice? Should they stop playing musical instruments because a major denomination does not allow it? Must Pentecostals and charismatics no longer speak in tongues because it offends fundamentalists? The Bible instructs us to employ the high praises of God (Ps. 149:6) and not to seek the lowest common denominator of praise in order to avoid offending people.
Those Christians who object to worship dance may be reverting to the first-century heresy known as Gnosticism, in which the spirit is thought to be entirely good, while matter is viewed as totally evil. This unbiblical dualism resulted in the teaching that the human body, which is matter, is evil, and that salvation is the escape from the body. Many who embraced this teaching in the first century either treated the body in an ascetic, harsh way or paradoxically, practiced the error of licentiousness. Both 1 John and the letter to the Colossians are written to correct this error. Unfortunately, many well-meaning Christians are still being influenced by Gnosticism. They insist that dancing stirs carnal rather than spiritual responses because it involves body movements. If the body is the expression of the spirit, then its movements should be used in worship to glorify God, as the Bible advocates, since both body and spirit belong to God (1 Cor. 6:19–20).
Some Christians have said that the promotion of dance as a worship form implies immaturity and a lack of desire for unity on the part of its advocates. It should be remembered in this connection that the Christian’s maturity is based on attaining to “the whole measure of the fullness of Christ” (Eph. 4:13). Maturity is measured by a person’s likeness to Christ and unity by “the faith,” the biblical revelation of truth. Being mature and promoting unity does not imply being forced into a nonscriptural position on the issue of praise in order to please all other believers and to satisfy their objections. Rather, both unity and maturity are products of a total commitment to the life-style of Jesus, which was a determined allegiance to Scripture and its patterns of response to God in the face of every human, rational, and religious objection to God’s revelation.
Does the one who dances before the Lord violate Paul’s injunction to the Romans against causing a brother to stumble (Rom. 14:13, 21)? No more so than when a worshiper plays an instrument, kneels, claps his or her hands, or engages in any other worship practice that might cause offense to another Christian. Obedience to the truth always causes offense; the gospel itself is an offense (1 Cor. 1:23; Gal. 5:11) but should not be abandoned on that account.
When God asks for a response from his people that requires liberty in praise, the acceptance of the limitation of other believers might satisfy them but could at the same time offend the Lord. Idolatry is the intrusion of any other object between the Christian and God in worship—even if the intruder is the desire for the approval of humans. When a local church relates boldly and unashamedly to God in its praise and worship, God will shine his glory upon it, bringing the greatest possible benefit to other believers as well as to the unconverted.